Frances Bula header image 2

Metro Vancouver pressures cities to give the region more control

May 20th, 2009 · 4 Comments

I hadn’t been paying that much attention to Metro Vancouver’s growth plan for the next 30 years. That’s partly because it’s been in the works for eight years and it’s hard to feel like it’s going anywhere.

And also because there’s a temptation to believe that it will have the same impact as the livable region strategy — a nice idea that gets forgotten the minute some municipality in the region gets an attractive proposition from a developer. So although the plan has some interesting ideas, in particular the plan to create an industrial-land reserve, it hasn’t generated much media attention.

That’s what Metro Vancouver’s head guy is worried about and so he’s out trying to sell the plan to municipalities with a heavy-hitting message: give us some power to give this plan some teeth, otherwise there’s hardly any point to passing it.

Johnny Carline was a Vancouver city council yesterday, warning that “if Vancouver does not support this, then I doubt the rest of the region will.” And if Vancouver doesn’t support it, the plan will become “basically a amagazine article that you wave around.”

Carline pointed out that more than half of the development done during the 20 years of the Livable Region Strategy happened outside the regional town centres where growth was supposed to be targeted. That’s proof, he says, that if the region seriously wants to make sure that growth happens efficiently — that it goes into areas well-served by transit and doesn’t go into agricultural or industrial land — the Metro Vancouver board should get the power to veto any approvals for rezonings from industrial that don’t get 50 per cent support from the board. (Vancouver, by the way, gets 29 votes out of 104 in the weighted system at the board.)

This is an issue that is probably under a lot of people’s radar but it has city planners, politicians, and those alert to land issues somewhat worried. A system like this will mean anyone developing a project that requires a rezoning to go through two levels of approval — a process that will add a new level of onerousness to one that’s already fraught.

So what’s the problem if everyone agrees that industrial land should be saved? Well, Vancouver is looking at allowing some rezonings around its transit stations in order to get more density around them. Right now, there are several stations — and in particular the new Canada Line station on Marine Drive — set in the middle of industrial land.

Carline kept insisting the new system won’t be onerous and that it only brings in “the weakest implementation plan” to try to give the new rules some teeth. But there were sure a lot of questions at council about how this will work.

Councillors have to decide in the next week whether to support the plan. I can’t tell, from listening, which way they’re going to go.

Categories: Uncategorized

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Darcy McGee // May 21, 2009 at 6:36 am

    Metro Vancouver needs to be merged.

    Merge the three north shore districts into one (and I might argue for including Lion’s Bay.) City of North Vancouver & District of North Vancouver? Dumb.

    Merge Vancouver, Burnaby, New Westminster and Richmond into Vancouver.

    Merge Surrey, Maple Ridge, Coquitlam and Port Coquitlam into another which I shall call “New Ikea.”

    There’s too many mayors, too many council members, too many staff, too many fifedoms.

    At the present time the GVRD level of government amounts to taxation without representation. Voters do not get input into its makeup.

    Merge the things, then you can rationalize the governmental structure.

  • 2 not tunning for mayor // May 21, 2009 at 9:07 am

    I agree with Darcy, although I’d probably divide them up differently, All of the North Shore as one, Van,Bby and New West as another, The Tri-cites all as one including Anmore, Surrey, North Delta, Langley,Aldergrove as another, and Richmond, South Delta, as it’s own. I doubt any attempt to unify everyone as one would ever pass so that would be the best we could aim for at this time. Perhaps if that panned out they could be merged in the future.

    The industrial land reserve should be created and elimate this extra step, the extra step would only come into play should someone try to remove land from the reserve.

  • 3 blaffergassted // May 21, 2009 at 11:18 am

    Burnaby was the first to use rapid transit as an engine for development, and the result is those new high rise communities popping up around Brentwood, Gilmore and Holdom stations.

  • 4 Darcy McGee // May 21, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    The specifics of the division are certainly a point of discussion, and my suggestions represent my personal biases as much as anything else. To some extent they’re defined by the geography of the rivers, but not purely….obviously.

    Whatever the case, the GVRD level of governance needs to be rationalized. Taxation without representation is exactly the kind of thing that once caused us to rise to the baracades; to storm the Bastille.

    Now it apparently causes us to vote Liberal.

Leave a Comment