Frances Bula header image 2

Warning: News about bike lanes in Los Angeles, New York

September 12th, 2011 · 68 Comments

Consider this blog post my once-monthly quota on all things bike-related. People who don’t like noise or violence should stay away from the comment section.

That said, I continue to find stories that make me think about the incredible worldwide push on to make bicycles a significant part of urban transportation systems. Is this part of a revolution as significant as 1950s freeway building? Or is it just a fashionable trend that will plateau in a few years, as attention turns elsewhere.

Two stories recently were striking:

This one today, about Los Angeles putting a bike lane through its downtown. Okay, the downtown is kind of a dead zone and the real traffic craziness is on the freeways, but still. I could actually see this expanding rapidly. One thing we noticed the last time we were in LA is that quite often the non-freeway arterials that run across the city are quite pleasant and not that crowded. Plus the city is relatively flat. Plus those streets are quite wide, so could easily accommodate bikes.

And then Frank Bruni’s column in the New York Times on the weekend, as he cycles around the city with much reviled Janette Sadik-Kahn (who visited here a couple of years ago), who has driven New York’s aggressive push for bike lanes and pedestrian zones in the middle of streets.

One thing I’d like to know in all this bike stuff is how many cars are really removed from the road when someone converts to cycling. It’s always been my suspicion that most people cycling are converting from transit, not cars.

However, those of you who follow my tweets know that I, in an excess of virtue, cycled to work twice out of four days last week, PLUS cycled to the farmers’ market for my load of organic vegetables that will quietly liquefy in my refrigerator this week. That was definitely one gas-hogging minivan removed from the road for those trips. Maybe there are more of those kinds of converts out there than I think.

By the way, one thing that I was pleasantly struck by last week on my commutes — the silence. Many people I know in Vancouver mourn the passing of the city of the 1970s mostly because of how tranquil it was compared to what it’s like now, with 24/7 streams of noise-spewing traffic.

But when you’re on a bike on the city’s great bike routes on the residential streets, you get to go back to that old, tranquil city. It’s incredibly quiet. You spend your time admiring instead, as you whoosh along, the lovely gardens, parents walking their kids to school, older couples strolling around hand in hand, owners out with their dogs.

If only our late summer could last forever, says this fair-weather cyclist.

 

Categories: Uncategorized

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Yes Bobbie Bees, that underscores nicely the confusing esoterica associated with those damned intersections. “Traffic calming”, that’s funny.

    Dan Cooper:

    “As to your other point, I have written before and will repeat now that, on average, Vancouver drivers are the most polite and accommodating I have seen anywhere, after living in various places around the US, Europe and Asia and travelling in other places.”

    I would agree except that I see poor driving behavior a little too often downtown and can’t ignore that people may have brought their bad driving habits from elsewhere.

    Perhaps it’s not so common in other parts of the city, but what drives me nuts most are: drivers who won’t let others into traffic at an intersection when it’s bumper to bumper, (in LA that courtesy is taken for granted); drivers who make hard turns at intersections from inside lanes!; drivers who move part way over to a turning lane but are still sitting halfway in the lane they came from, blocking the traffic behind them.

    But otherwise, I’ve found drivers in Vancouver courteous and aware when I’m cycling, and have never felt in danger, even downtown during rush hour.

  • Michael Geller

    I was happy to let this conversation just drift on until Chris responded to the call about ‘elderly’ cyclists by describing the 62 year old lady he just met.

    Chris, let me just say that when you’re in your early 60’s, you are not going to like it when people refer to you as one of the elderly.

    For what it’s worth, the elderly start around 80 these days.

    OK, now you can get back to the topic of helmets.

  • Morry

    bicycling is the most efficient form of moving people.
    period.
    deal with it.
    http://gotoes.org/bikestuff/index.htm

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Meanwhile,

    VANCOUVER — Despite the global economic downturn and rising fuel prices, luxury car sales in Vancouver are still on the rise.

    Read more: http://www.theprovince.com/business/Luxury+vehicles+ticket+Asian+buyers/5397788/story.html#ixzz1XtUvjO6a

  • Bobbie Bees

    @TOAB – this made me laugh : “”People trust ‘Made in Germany,'” he said. “Most parents want their wife or kids to drive a solid car to be safe.”

    HAHAHAHA…..

    So that’s how the media sells ‘Cars are safe” to the masses, eh?
    I guess the nice ting about being safe in your solid car is that you no longer have to watch out for pesky hazards like pedestrians in marked cross walks or cyclists in painted bicycle lanes.
    Just mow ’em down and then claim that they jumped out from behind a parked car and that you had no choice but to run them down.
    Kinda like Brent Parent when he ran a vehicle off the road in Langley. I want to hear what his defence is [removed for legal reasons]
    Or in New west what about the guy who was just recently driving along the boardwalk (a pedestrian only zone) in his Audi because he was drunk.
    Or the 12 kids recently caught racing in high performance vehicles on highway 99.
    I guess that’s all good, eh?
    As long as the car drivers doing the stupidity were driving ‘nice solid vehicles’ everything is good, right?
    And I guess we should thank our lucky stars that not one of those drivers was riding a bicycle. Man, can you imagine the potential carnage had they been riding bicycles, especially without helmets?

  • Richard

    @ThinkOutsideABox

    And in other news, the Netherlands has one of the highest car ownership rates in Europe, yet it has very high rates of cycling. When people have money, they spend it on stuff including cars, that does not mean they use the stuff that often.

  • Glissando Remmy

    The Thought of The Evening

    “One comment in particular reminded me of an epitaph written on a funerary stone – ‘Here lays for Eternity, our pedestrian friend and avid cyclist JJ Magoo, who had… the right of way.’ ”
    Please everyone, draw your own conclusions.

    Following are all Seven Avid ‘s Cyclist Commandments, before and after the Vision ‘s Farmers came to town :

    1. Whatever goes upon 4 wheels is not an enemy.
    After Vision… the cyclists start dealing with human drivers and end up riding 4 wheels bicycles in spite.

    2. Whatever goes upon two wheels, or has skinny rubber and a seat, is a friend.
    …Then the cycling coalition announced that the cyclists that don’t ride $1,000 Jorg&Olif bikes… are inferior.

    3. No cyclist shall be without helmets and lycra suits.
    … Then it was changed to ‘unless you are approaching menopause or your name is Geoff’.

    4. No cyclist shall ride on the sidewalks.
    … Changed to ‘No cyclist shall ride on the sidewalks unless texting and/ or chatting on the cell, unless the sidewalk is crowded, and with no policeman in sight’.

    5. No cyclist shall drink alcohol and bike.
    … No cyclist shall drink alcohol to excess’ and end up getting drunk often, unless they have a designated tandem biker .

    6. No cyclist shall steal other cyclist’s bike.
    … No cyclist shall steal other cyclist’s bike without cause’ like – they like it a lot! and/ or it is not Hollyhock affiliated.

    7. All cyclists are equal.
    … ‘All cyclists are equal, but some closer to the Vision Vancouver circle of influence are more equal than others’ … like the biker mayor.

    Bobbie Bees,
    “Taquiner la muse?”
    I am all flushed for the interest you are showing, but I’m sorry, I don’t like you… that way!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39YUXIKrOFk&ob=av3e

    We live in Vancouver and this keeps us busy.

  • Paul T.

    Bobbie for the last time, this isn’t an issue that needs to be looked at as an US and THEM issue. Gregor and his backers love to tout bike issues to get people like you on their side. Fact is, they have made a huge issue out of a relatively simple thing.

    By re-inventing the wheel and choosing poor routes and then not listening when residents screamed in terror at the damage the Hornby lane would cause, they basically dug their own graves. (Shovels hit the ground 6 hours after the vote.)

    You can’t govern the city by looking after a few vocal minorities. Decisions need to have common sense behind them. And they need to be made with the best interest for ALL city residents and visitors.

    I’m also constantly shocked by the bicycling lobby’s devout following of all things Vision. They spent more money for wayyyy less facilities than NPA councils before them. Just because Gregor was a critical masser, doesn’t mean he’s more pro-bike or is able to get more done.

    As for your claim of cars running red lights and the like, no one is perfect and we have police and courts to look after those who would willing flaunt the law. Enforcement against cars more than dwarfs enforcement of pedestrians and cyclists. Yet, on any given day I can find pedestrians and cyclists breaking the law, way more than vehicle drivers. But you’re right, risk is lower so I’m not recommending a full on blitz of riders or walkers.

    Let’s keep perspective. Car drivers are just pedestrians on wheels. Better education is making them better drivers and will continue to do that.

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    @ Richard,

    Perhaps but the article underscores that there will continue to be a, forgive the pun, ‘critical mass’, who won’t be guilted or inconvenienced out of private vehicle use due to cost, fiat or preaching to the choir – and on the luxury side, let’s be honest, the technology is still at a point for the moment where for the most part the more luxury the vehicle, the more cylinders and fuel displacement of the engine.

    I also wouldn’t subscribe to an illusion that most of the clients the article refers to are making their way through Vancouver as if it is Netherlands or that their primary mode of transportation is Translink or the bike.

  • Chris Keam

    @Michael Geller

    Point taken. No disrespect intended.

    This is my favorite elderly lady cyclist of all time.

    Bicycle Portraits – Stephanie Baker from Bicycle Portraits on Vimeo.

  • Glissando Remmy

    The Thought Of The Day

    “Yeah, In South Africa The Whites are still making The Blacks get out of their way. It’s good for public relations…”

    CK #60,
    LMAO, no really, common, are you using the ‘young age’ now to make a weak point?
    The whole clip posted is nothing but a pathetic non paid advertising to a… bike. More than half is… static, showing a bike like in a ‘car’ Ad, and then the lady rides her bike… on the sidewalk, making the group of teens become one item with the nearby wall. Too funny!

    And what exactly was the point that you wanted to make? That they also speak Afrikaans in SA?

    Ons woon in Vancouver en dit hou ons besig .

  • Richard

    @ThinkOutsideABox

    No one is claiming that cycling works for everyone for every trip but it can work for a lot of people for a lot of trips if there are separated paths and lanes that make it safe, convenient and comfortable. Not everyone can use a car either.

  • Bill Lee

    Quota? Fabula can only find one mention of bicycles a month. to make a minimum quota? 😉

    Meanwhile in Seattle
    Subject: Bicycle fatality raises safety issues | Seattle Times Newspaper
    X-URL: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2016189583.html
    Wednesday, September 14, 2011 – Page updated at 11:30 a.m.

    Bicycle fatality raises safety issues
    By Mike Lindblom and Susan Gilmore
    Seattle Times staff reporters

    As friends of sandwich-delivery man Robert Townsend mourn his death in a weekend bike crash, Seattle-area cycling advocates are wondering how to encourage safety on the streets.
    At least 12 bicyclists have died so far this year across the state — nine in crashes with motor vehicles, one who accidentally fell into a stairwell, one who was struck by a train, and one who was tripped up on a trail. On average, there are 10 in an entire year. …[ more ]

    [ And those streets Madame Bula pedalled are quiet beccause no one uses their front porch, and there are not kids playing in the streets anymore. The city has lost its youthrfullness.

    I would like to see helmets and gloves made mandatory as T.E. Hems ofthe Oxford Accident Service advocated in the Journal of Trauma about the issue.
    Hand injuries that don’t involve bones took an average time off work of 17.6 days. What a lot of mouth and stick blogger commentators that would make.

    And where are the lights now after 7 pm when it is dark. Why not reflective vests all the time.

  • Bobbie Bees

    Okay Bill, I’ll bite. I’ll go for gloves and helmets and high viz vests, so long as car occupants are required to use four point harnesses, helmets and fire retardant clothing.
    Also, as you pointed out, hand injuries can constitute time off work, so can bone injuries of any kind.

  • David

    I’m somewhat reluctant to enter this debate again, but technically, by the letter of the law, peds should not cross the side street when the light is red.

    Red light
    129
    (4) When a red light alone is exhibited at an intersection by a traffic control signal,

    (a) a pedestrian facing the red light must not enter the roadway unless instructed that he
    or she may do so by a pedestrian traffic control signal

    No mention of green lights…. and while it’s probable that this was intended for intersections that have a full set of traffic lights, but lack separate ped signals, (as used to be the case at Arbutus and Broadway and Arbutus and Cornwall), this is the only section that deals with pedestrians and red lights

    >How on earth are you going to require pedestrians, who may never have had a drivers license, obey regulations from the motor vehicle act?

    The same way you’d require a drug dealer, who’d never studied for a law degree, obey the criminal code. I’ll bet that “I don’t have a driver’s license” has ever been an effective defense against a J-Walking ticket. Someone was complaining in a local paper about getting a warning (not a ticket) for starting to cross on a Don’t Walk…. and complained about there being no advertising campaign. Really? Even my 5 year old knows a red hand means “Don’t walk!

    All this said, I do agree and am annoyed when vehicles blast through the stop signs when the ped signal stops traffic on the main road,but am also aware that there is no stop sign *exiting* the intersection for vehicles proceeding straight.

    Even buses… the MVA mentions how the white bar trumps the red light… but doesn’t mention stop signs..

    (2) The driver of a bus approaching an intersection and facing a red light and a prescribed white rectangular indicator may cause the bus to proceed through the intersection.

    though on 2nd thought, the white bar wasn’t on, just the flashing don’t walk sign, when I saw the 134 blow this stop sign last week. http://g.co/maps/gfyg7

    So yes, while I will too sometimes cross on the red, if there are vehicles who can only exit the side streets when the ped light is red, I’ll let them go (and let’s not forget, they’re not “cars”, they’re people inside just like us), and sometimes practicing the Golden Rule (such as stopping to let a car make a left at an uncontrolled intersection during a rare break in oncoming traffic) is worth the 5 seconds delay in my day.

    (and don’t get me started on how drivers (and cyclists) don’t “get” uncontrolled T intersections)

  • Bobbie Bees

    David, years ago I talked to ICBC about these intersections. ICBC is not happy with Vancouver for using these types of intersections. ICBC is pushing to have municipalities adopt the MUTCD “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices”. This manual comes from the US DOT.
    These Vancouver intersections use conflicting controls. This is something that the MUTCD strictly forbids.
    The City uses a flashing green / solid red to control traffic on the main road.
    The they turn around and use a STOP sign on the side streets.
    The City of Vancouver Street and Traffic Bylaw doesn’t even mention these signal combinations.
    But as a driver who arrived here in ’91 with a drivers license from Ontario and took my motorcycle training out here, I was told by my course instructor to always stop and let the pedestrians cross. If you hit a pedestrian in one of these crosswalks, you’ll always loose in court as you left a stop sign when it wasn’t safe to do so.

    And so far as I can tell, the City of Vancouver isn’t letting up on these intersections either. First, they prevent ‘rat racing’ in the west end.
    Second, a brand new one is going in at Davie and Bidwell.
    And when you think about it, the added cost of installing pedestrian signals for the side streets would be minuscule, but then the city would be defeating their reasons for placing STOP signs on the side street.

  • Paul T.

    Bobbie, a couple of points (and for once I’m not disagreeing, just bringing a countering opinion.)

    I asked a VPD officer once about the Red-light / Stop sign thing, his response to me was a bit of common sense. It doesn’t matter who has the right of way, you weigh 150 pounds, the car weighs over a ton. It doesn’t matter if you’re right, if you’re dead.

    At the time I was less than impressed with response cuz I really wanted to know what the law was. But I think the officer was right in advising that because really at the end of the day a 5 second inconvenience to allow the person driving through didn’t make a huge impact on my day. And we are Canadians eh, so being polite should come naturally.

    Also on your point about new signals being put in, I see there’s one going up at Granville and 15th (or 14th) and they’ve FINALLY turned the one at Granville and 6th (or 5th) on. Has anyone else noticed how long it’s taking city staff to get these new signals operating. I swear it takes literally MONTHS between when they hang the new hardware to when they finally pull off the coverings and turn them on. Why the delay? Is the budget that tight? Or is there some other reason?

  • David

    I remember 30 years ago, when these signals were not as prolific as they are
    now, the cross streets (Vine @ 4th, Balsam @ 4th) would have a permanently
    blinking red light (stop, proceed when safe) along with the stop signs… As the
    number of these intersections grew, the blinking reds were omitted, and
    were removed from intersections that once had them..

    You’re right, the MUTCD could not be more clear (A flashing green signal indication has
    no meaning and shall not be used)… in Ontario a rapid flashing green
    indicates a protected left turn…. similar to our flashing arrow.

    Interesting that the MVA requires a higher level of caution approaching flashing greens than solid greens… I wonder
    how many motorists know this…

    So. where does that leave us… the intention was noble, provide a way to
    stop traffic with a solid red light to give pedestrians a chance to cross busy
    streets, without encouraging traffic onto the streets that have the lights.
    Maybe this made sense 30 years ago, but over the years so many have been
    added (4th has lights at every intersection from Pine to Balsam, Broadway from Yukon to … Vine?) the ‘not encourage traffic’ consideration is probably moot

    Should they be upgraded to fully controlled intersections? Are the
    relatively new to Vancouver flashing overhead lights such as at Thurlow and
    Comox http://g.co/maps/mftpm a better alternative? They’re instant, no wait
    for a walk signal. I’d make one change… use flashing reds (stop, proceed when safe) instead of the current flashing yellows