Frances Bula header image 2

Vancouver hires “change manager” as it struggles with employee backlash

September 23rd, 2010 · 24 Comments

Vancouver city hall continues to be a workplace under stress. News broke earlier that the non-union staff had issued a memo outlining their concerns about the new style of management. While I know there are some people who are really enjoying working with new city manager Penny Ballem — they like her directness, willingness to listen to new ideas, and decisiveness — I continue to hear daily complaints from people in various departments and at various levels in the system.

I explored this a little in my Globe story here, looking at how Ms. Ballem is dealing with this and what the organizational-change experts have to say.

(Roger, perhaps you could re-post your comment here.)

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Roger Kemble

    This is bizarre . . .

    Vancouver city hall has hired its first-ever “change manager” and is conducting its first-ever employee survey this week as part a drive to reshape its 10,000-person bureaucracy.

    Am I reading this correctly Frances? 10,000!

    Losh! That’s an awful lot of people running around with a stash of paper under their arm.

    I assume it does not include the people who fix the pipes and dig up the roads: they are not bureaucracy.

    Ms (sic Dr.) Ballem has. . . pushed staff to write streamlined reports . . .

    Despite . . .

    . . . the 700 non-union staff association in which representatives stressed that the “new style of management” isn’t working . . .

    Isn’t that sort of sending the dear Dr. a message?

    Does she need an . . . “organizational change consultant, Susanne Matheson of Tekara Organizational Effectiveness Inc.

    and hire . . .

    a full-time change manager, Matt MacEachern.

    Ms. (Dr) Ballem also commissioned the Hay Group to do the city’s first employee survey.

    Invoking a comment from SFU Professor Gervase Bushe, “What happens when you change something, it launches many people into a grieving process . . .

    Grieving!” Sir you godda be kiddin’! More like utter astonishment that the good doctor, hiring all those, out-side, witch doctors, is way, way out of her pay category . . .

  • Bill Lee

    http://vancouver.ca/humanresources/index.htm says 9,000 employees.

    A dozen to carry the councillor’s throne, about 1700 police, 800 fireMEN (6 women),
    library, parks etc. Would they include the School Board too?
    Trying to find numbers on the http://1004.cupe.ca/ Local 1004 website
    It all adds up.

  • Diderottoo

    “… the Vision Vancouver administration has been making… significant changes internally to create an organization more like a provincial ministry – attentive to what the political leaders want, centralized and more top down, quick to react and focused on efficient communication.”

    The part that is true is “attentive to political leaders, top down and centralized.” Actually that is all understated. The workforce is politicized to greater depths than ever imagined by previous administrations and it’s not pretty. Do you want your permit held up because some councilor knows somebody who needs theirs in a hurry? Do you want the bureaucracy so centralized that decisions take months longer than they did before? Don’t you think professional staff should earn their pay by applying their professional judgement?

    The part that is not true is “quick to react and focused on efficient communication” unless you mean quick to react to anything that might be in the press and reflect poorly. Otherwise, the nitty gritty business of running the City is grinding nearly to a halt as reports get edited and re-edited endlessly, often in the end with important facts removed because they might cause the public/media to protest.

    The other irony is that the natural leaders in the organization, the change makers who gave us some of our best policies and strategies in the last 10-15 years are the ones who are most disillusioned. These are people who want to get things done and who embrace the very issues Vision purports to espouse. But we have seen this Council talk the talk but decidedly not walk the walk on green, social and accountability/transparency issues time after time.

    In other words, they are trying to fix the parts that weren’t broke and the parts that were cracked they have smashed to smithereens.

  • archie’s dad

    Change the Manager – Indeed!

  • city hall insider

    Change is long overdue in the Hall and we are all enduring the whining of a group that has controlled City Hall for many years under NPA regimes. To cry out that the current administration is politicizing the workforce is laughable. We have witnessed years of political appointments to management positions in this organization. The outcry at the hall from our hard done by managers is a result of the fact that their buddies are not in power any more to protect them from their nice gigs. The “leaked” memo is a calculated response from a group that is fearful of the changes that will be coming to City Hall once the Employee survey released and the services review is complete. We are seeing people being called into account. We have lobbied for change for a long time here and now we are beginning to see it. Many of us approve of what is going on. Let’s hope this new guy really knows what he is doing.

  • Mary

    The employees I heard today were furious at this city manager and council taking credit for the Olympics. Funny how they’ll take credit for the Olympics but not the Olympic Village. People also thought it sadly laughable that their ‘voluntold’ duties were seen as “engagement”. Many chose an Olympic duty over writing by-law infractions – the only two choices they were given.

  • Mr Archive

    My My.

    I can only conclude that Nurse Ratched has taken over City Hall.

    Voodoo Change Artist. Enough to make you puke.

    That is it. I voted fro Gregor, but it is time to kick him and his loony beanies out on their ear.

  • Tom

    Hmmm.

    I find it interesting that your host didn’t feel it was important enough to report on the results of the motions presented by suzanne anton and david cadman, and what they may mean to the chess game going forward to 2011.

    BUT, we have a post on an announcement about nothing, and another on the city hiring a change manager so that there can be more bickering on this site from those sitting on opposite sides of the fence, like “city hall insider” and “diderottoo”.

    Nice going Francis. Either you wish to flame the comments section of your blog to generate traffic, or you feel it necessary to play along with Visions game plan of divide and conquer.

    It’s almost, but not quite as pathetic, as the Vancouver Sun video of jeff lee and fazil mahir discussing the bad summer for Gregor, while (when listing) all of the Vision blunders, fazil conveniently leaves out the Sun’s role in hiring Vision’s blog-whore Jonathon Ross to pen columns in the section he edits.

    I guess he didn’t want to bring the Sun’s reputation into question by mentioning that a paid attack-slug had achieved the unthinkable, which includes getting space to thump Vision propaganda under the guise of balanced commentary.

    I get why fazil didn’t bother listing the Ross saga in his Vision blunder list, but what I don’t get is what’s your reason?

    Do you feel that Suzanne was just playing politics with her motion?

    Do you believe that many taxpayers don’t want answers on this issue that Vision has been sidestepping around?

    Are you afraid of Gregor’s threat to sue, should you write about it?

    What about Cadman’s motion to lower Ballum’s threshold for untendered no-bid contracts back to where it was in 2008?

    Any reason why you felt this wasn’t of interest to your readers?

    Are you not interested in helping us understand where COPE and VISION sit with Woodsworth and Cadman coming out with motions that are clearly meant to muzzle the likes of Penny Ballum, Geoof Meggs and our mayor?

    Why are these issues of no interest to you Frances?

  • Morven

    The change management I would want to see is better oversight by the elected representatives.

    They could start with the planning and development consultation process then we ordinary taxpayers might believe change management is occurring
    -30-

  • Insiders at the City

    Can’t help but wonder if City Hall insider is a political appointment or a Vision person or a real hall worker.

    Judging from the vast majority I have dealt with and know at 12th & Cambie, VPD and elsewhere, the fans are restless. The cuts, the lack of leadership, the buckling under by new people to present regime, the lack of rationale or common sense for new initiatives don’t bode well.

    Already there is lots of talk amongst staff how they are feeling pressured to respond positively to the changes despite the reality.

    Talk to a cop about Chief Chu for example.. their is ambivalence and lack of confidence in spades on this guy and how he contradicts himself to satisfy his political masters to the detriment of the department. Not Good to say the least!

  • Dan Cooper

    As I wrote in my comment on the G&M site, I cannot say from my vantage point whether the specific changes being made at City Hall are good are bad. However, my hackles go up every time I hear managers and their advisors from the change industry go on about how Change! Is! Good!, and the only possible response to any change is to love it, get over it, or quit. I have seen a (governmental) organization where I worked some years ago literally cease functioning – with a full third of the staff on stress leave, processing of urgent applications taking three months rather than the usual one, and the telephone system collapsed under an overload of angry client messages – because of changes that were forced on the objecting workers with just such language.

  • Dan Cooper

    Here comes my usual correction… A part of the final sentence above should read, “…urgent applications taking three months rather than the usual one day.”

  • Roger Kemble

    Fred Hume was the mayor when I arrived. He was very popular because we could see his Christmas lights on his home in the British Properties: he didn’t even live in Vancouver.

    But his city was thriving. We all had good jobs and we could afford to live in town and move up to West Van with our families. Hallistas were seen but not heard: they did their job. Our future was rosy.

    Mayor Rathie’s reptilian eyes scared the hell out of me when a group of us CAC people proposed our ALLEYBACK plan to literally take back the alleys from garbage cans and festooning power lines. He being a trucker was unimpressed. The city was becoming brittle on his watch.

    I went by myself to talk to mayor Campbell about FCN, that I thought then, and still do, was not going the right way. With mayor Campbell we were seeing the introduction of empty jargon: world class, paradise, etc. I left his office feeling I had been run down by an ice road trucker.

    I haven’t met Mayor Robertson but, despite his knobbley knees and kilt, I’ll bet he can toss a haggis farther than he can toss a caber: unscottish-like he relies too much on apparatchiks.

    Dr. Penny Ballem is a very pretty lady although she looks, recently, grey and very harrassed: she is nevertheless the consummate apparatchik and I do not thinq that is working for her, the mayor or the city. Change for the sake of change is never good.

    A bureaucracy will always be dysfunctional by the very nature of its efficiency pretensions: it will never live up to expectations. As for this current bureaucracy, we have elevated it way higher than its ability to satisfy our delusions.

    And Dr. Ballem calling in these disparate, outside change experts is just an admission that she has dug her hole way over her head.

    You have very generous retirement package Dr. Ballem: use it before you get beaten up.

    Come sailing with me and I’ll have you rosy cheeked in time for Michaelmas . . .

  • dave

    Employee backlash…..ha ha…700 exempt staff consisting of overpaid superintendants geting paid about 100,000 plus a year that is the 700 .

    So THEY DIDNT HAVE A PROBLEM CLEANING TOILETS AND CHANGING LIGHT BULBS FOR DOUBLE TIME DURING THE LAST STRIKE. But now their feelings are hurt, they cant manage and no one is listening to their ideas …..do what the true employees of city of vancouver did go on strike…..You all make me puke. No post secondary education just friends with special “rings”

  • Bill Lee

    Fred Hume was popular because there was money galore from the post-war boom in housing and building generally. Thus the Granville Street Bridge Highway etc.

    He had been mayor of the first (1858) great city, New Westminster (1933-1942) before that of Vancouver (1951-1958). And the terms were one year long in those days. Hume also was a dollar-a-year mayor in Vancouver. That seemed good in those days.

    Not to be compared to Mayor Meggs/Robertson.

  • Taxpayer

    Well it is about time that the people elected by the people of Vancouver took control of the city. For the last several years, it was pretty clear that staff ran the city and paid little attention to either the politicians or the public. I’ve talked to councillors on both sides of the isle that said that senior staff would tell them what could and could not be done.

    The Olympic Village should be more than enough evidence that some of the senior staff back then did not have a clue.

  • city hall insider

    In response to “Insiders at the City” I am a Real Hall Worker. How about you?
    Some people have had a real good thing for a long time and now the cat is out of the bag. It seems to have hit a nerve.
    I question which staff feel pressured to respond to changes despite “reality” Realtity is change is coming and the party is over.

  • landlord

    @ Taxpayer : “…the people elected by the people of Vancouver…”.
    There’s your problem right there. These people were elected by a majority of the one-third of the electorate who could be bothered to vote. Most people couldn’t tell you more than one or two Councillor’s names, never mind what they supposedly stand for. Conceivably that means that just over one-sixth of the population gets “represented”.
    How can that work? At best they’re putting off the inevitable while locking in those gold-plated, indexed public pensions.
    If it’s a question of qualified, experienced staff making the decisions or a bunch of Leftoid, green-utopian cultists with American financing and their hand-picked organization-destroyer, who are only going to be around for 6-8 years or so, hmmmmm…let’s see, that’s a tough one…

  • dave

    In response to “City Hall Insider”….I too am a city of vancouver employee and agree with alot of your comments. The Change has finally arived @ the city of vancouver and unlike our past city manager the present Dr Ballem is actually listening. The findings of the Hay report will be coming out soon and just like our superintendants “leaked” there 700 exempt staff report out to the media so will we .The taxpayers of vancouver can finally know truthfully what is going on @ city hall and manitoba and national yards. The gig is up …to those of you who go on 1 hour coffee breaks , play games on your computers and make fun of your labourers that work underneath you as they say adios………………………….

  • Oh My

    Lots of chatter but no substance. Vision and Penny Bellum are istruments of change and quite frankly City Hall needs it. Good for them!
    Any good manager seeks out people who have expertice in particular areas. The fact she has done so is not a sign of weakness it is a sign that she is listening. I suggest the disgruntled get on board and shape change through constructive dialogue. I am sure that you will be more successful than presenting a list of grievances and complaints and telling everyone who will listen how bad it is and you don’t want to change.

    I note the time of day of most of the submissions by those who say they are staff and those I suspect are staff and am not surprised to see the post are during office hours. I don’t have a problem with that if you were taking the discussion forward but to simply take the time to complain is shameful. Are there any ideas on how to make it better?

  • MB

    Oh My, right on.

  • Roger Kemble

    HUH! I am definitely an out-sider but I can see the need for change where my contact meets the hall:

    . . . planning . . .

    If Dr. Ballem needs outside change expertise she has a problem: she, and her experts, can only see procedures: (superficial) change. If Dr. Ballem had more experience at Thu Hall she would have no need parachutists.

    Its analogous to the downfall of manufacturing because MBA’s have taken over the farm.

    I am looking for substantive change: development planning.

    Planners need to see the city differently. The planning department must be separated into distinct parts . . .

    Approvals . . . essentially clerks’ jobs . . .

    Public interface . . . communications (not PR) public involvement.

    and

    Urban conceptions . . . this is the job of artists educated in spatial concepts and relationships.

    The latter is the work for experienced artists.

    I believe planners can be bamboozled by developers and have been many times: FCN and the brilliant NEFC plans (see link) comes to mind.

    I do not believe all this nonsense about computer games on company time!

  • dave

    hey Roger,
    Call mike jackson cupe 1004 president ……604 324 2440 and ask him about city hall management playing computer games and watching movies during negotiations.The truth will make you a “believer” …………..

  • Oh My

    I am sure we can find lots of examples of managers doing all sorts of of things they shouldn’t be doing on company time in most large organizations. I can walk through our office and on occasion a computer screen changes or goes blank as I approach so I don’t see – not great but it happens. Is everyone in the office doing it? Is this our culture? No. Could I convince other people in my office that this sort of thing happens all the time and everyone is doing it? Yes

    My point is I don’t understand Mr. Kemble’s or Dave’s comments. You will never reorganize the Planning department (don’t get me started on its current director) or stop manager’s mis-use of their time without strong senior management leading the way with a clear vision and a willingness to listen. So Penny start listening, staff stop complaining, and Cupe stop trying to undermine management with fluffed up stories of how hard it is to work with these folks.

    If you want to stay in your silo then don’t complain about how nothing ever changes.

    Stop your suffering through dialogue.