Frances Bula header image 2

TransLink’s proposed plan for 2013: What the heck does it mean?

September 17th, 2012 · 24 Comments

The full news release from TL is below. Interpreters, please? I notice Jeff Nagel is writing that this depends on mayors agreeing to the property-tax increase they refused in the spring.

I notice elsewhere Coast Mountain drivers are claiming 50,000 of hours are being cut, but TransLink said about 100,000 hours are being added.

Can we crowd-source the deeper implications of this, please?

TransLink’s plan delivers fiscal responsibility
$98 million in annual efficiencies over the next three years

VANCOUVER –  Cutting costs and making the best use of existing resources to drive new revenue is the focus of TransLink’s transportation plan for the next three years.

“Our focus is being fiscally responsible,” said TransLink Board Chair Nancy Olewiler. “We are delivering an integrated transportation system to keep people and goods moving in the region, while making the most of every dollar we have. Over the next three years, we will live within our means and only deliver those services for which we have the necessary funding.”

The draft 2013 Base Plan tabled today identifies an average of $98 million in new efficiencies annually over the next three years. These efficiency measures, along with drawing on the reserve fund, will fill a portion of the funding gap needed to maintain existing services and allow a number of planned transportation improvement projects to proceed.

“We evaluated every project and placed priority on those that not only address immediate needs like overcrowding, but also support long-term goals for the region,” said TransLink Executive Vice President of Strategic Planning and Public Affairs Robert Paddon. “While this draft plan will not fulfil these goals entirely, we are doing everything we can to keep us on a path to a more sustainable future in a fiscally responsible way.”

The following planned projects will proceed:

*   The region’s contribution to the Evergreen Line project.
*   109,000 new hours of transit service. Some hours were implemented in April 2012.
*   Rapid Bus service on Highway 1 over the Port Mann Bridge from Carvolth Transit Exchange in Langley to SkyTrain in New Westminster, every 10 minutes during peak hours and 30 minutes during off-peak hours.
*   B-Line service every seven to eight minutes on King George Boulevard and 104th Avenue between Newton and Guilford.
*   Upgrades to Expo Line stations including improving capacity and accessibility at Main St. and Scott Road, Metrotown, Commercial-Broadway, Surrey Central, New Westminster and Joyce-Collingwood stations.

In April, the Regional Transportation Commissioner rejected a supplementary fare increase and made several recommendations for more efficient operations. Since then, TransLink’s budget has been further challenged by a number of factors, including lower than expected fuel tax revenues, lower than expected fare and toll revenues, and the deferral of the sale of surplus real estate.

Despite aggressive efforts on efficiencies and drawing on reserves, the impact of these lower than expected revenues means that several planned improvements will not proceed:

*   306,000 hours of bus service hours.
*   10-minute, off-peak frequency on the Highway 1 Rapid Bus service.
*   The White Rock Centre extension on the King George Boulevard B-Line service.
*   Expanded SeaBus service to provide 15-minute service on Sundays and holidays in fall, winter and spring.
*   Restoring original funding for cycling programs and the Major Road Network.

TransLink is engaging elected officials, key stakeholders and the public to discuss the draft plan before it is finalised by November 1 and submitted to the Transportation Commissioner for review.

Categories: Uncategorized

  • boohoo

    Not sure how every 10 minutes during rush and every 30 minutes (!) off-rush is considered ‘rapid’.

    Translink is broken. It’s not working. We have stories of overcrowded buses, long waits and pass ups, a new skytrain line that is way above capacity the day it opens, people begging for more transit and we cut cut cut while we cry about having no money yet we build highways all over the place.

    This is just window dressing. We need real change with a real vision with real dollars attached to it.

  • RossK

    Does this not mean that TL is dealing with the EGreen line ‘funding gap’ by making cuts, precisely as instructed by the current Premier back in March?

    .

  • mike0123

    As mentioned, 30-minute off-peak headways do not meet Translink’s minimum standard for calling a route frequent. This service pattern might be better referred to as commuter express.

  • Roger Kemble

    boohoo @ #1

    We need real change with a real vision with real dollars attached to it.

    Agreed whole heartedly.

    Let’s start by looking who we are and what we are doing instead of careening all over the map.

    1. We don’t have any money.

    2. We now know our old habits do not work

    3. The city is a place were we live and work . . .

    http://www.theyorkshirelad.ca/1yorkshirelad/vancouver.re-boot/Vancouver.re-boot.html

    . . . bring the two closer together.

  • keith♠

    If transit ridership is up, why is fare revenue not up?
    Could it be that transit passes are losing money, and it would be better to go towards a full pay as you go system with smart cards.

  • Mira

    Frances asks:
    “The full news release from TL is below. Interpreters, please?”
    A:
    Translink and the mayors… they have no clue of what to do. They put together long costly reports and presentations, and then they hope for the best.
    In the end someone gets the shaft.
    If you guessed that it’s not Translink and it’s not the mayors… you guessed right!

  • boohoo

    If by the shaft you mean who will pay for it, of course it’s the public, who else would it be?

    This starts at the Province. The province created translink, made it unaccountable and has handcuffed it from providing what it is mandated to provide.

    They need to fix this.

  • waltyss

    Rather than worrying about who is getting the “shaft” (a case can be made for almost anyone getting the shaft); we should get rid of this monstrosity called Translink, go back to the drawing board, keeping in mind that :
    a) we need a good and robust public transit system
    b) we all have to be involved in paying for it.
    c) when the authorities make a decision on what that funding model should be, then spend some time to explain it and sell it to us rather than foisting one off, ad hoc gapfillers.

  • Chris Porter

    It’s ridiculous that the province is willing to spend billions on new highways and bridges but refuses to adequately fund public transit. There’s a huge pent up demand for public transit – the Canada Line is years ahead of its growth forecast. Meanwhile, the highway projects are missing their growth forecasts and underperforming vs the models used tho justify there costs and size. Did we really need to build the widest bridge in the world, 10 lanes on the Port Mann?

    There’s a generational shift moving away from the car, but the Ministry of Transportation is operating like it’s 1990.

  • Chris Keam

    Just did Burnaby/Commercial/Granville Is/Main St for $3.75 (just under 90 min single fare cut off, with a fifteen min stop in the middle) with a seat for every leg but the last (99b of course) and no more than a few minutes wait at any of the 5 transfers along the way. That’s pretty good, and it could be a system-wide norm with appropriate funding levels. Add my voice to the chorus calling for better leadership at the provincial level — focusing on the long term needs of the region, rather than immediate vote trolling concessions to the single occupant vehicle user.

  • Everyman

    I’d say this is a good argument for municipal amalgamation, and then turning the whole of Translink over to the new super-city. This would ensure that regional demands are met, and remove provincial meddling. Gas tax revenue could be turned over to the new entity as well.

  • Richard

    @Everyman

    Toronto. I rest my case.

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Toronto. I rest my case.

    Not sure I follow. Are you suggesting caution against a Metro Vancouver city modelled like the GTA for some unrelated reason? Or that the TTC fared worse after the GTA was formed?

    The latest news items on the TTC are about a worker who got hit by a train, and otherwise “TTC boosts frequency on 34 routes” due to increased ridership and revenues:

    http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/ttc/article/1248929–ttc-boosts-frequency-on-34-routes

  • Sean Nelson

    @Chris Porter # 9

    Hear, hear!

  • Raingurl

    Translink reminds me of my ex boyfriend. All full of promises and on the day he/they should deliver……..NOTHING! (He didn’t make sense either). Some days I wish I could dump Translink like I dumped my ex boyfriend but I sold my car and bought a bus pass……….At least I made ONE good decision last year!

  • Raingurl

    I’m a Translink Prisoner. I can hear the clink of the ball and chain every time I walk to the bus stop. I think I’ve lost ten pounds since I decided to rely on Translink. Who needs the gym when you’ve got a Translink bus pass! haha!

  • Raingurl

    The car co-op is looking better and better. I’ve never been good at relying on other people. Thanks Translink, you’ve successfully broken me. I’m going back to the gas station. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!

  • Mira

    Raingurl #16,
    can you afford the gym fees, after you pay for your monthly pass? You go girl! 🙂

  • Dan Cooper

    No great surprise that using transit (or more generally, not driving a car) might lead to weight loss, which generally is not considered a bad thing by most people. When you stop rolling out of your easy chair into your car and out of your car into your desk chair, instead actually doing those “walking” and “standing” things also known as “exercise”…well, there you are, burning calories! *heh*

  • Raingurl

    Hey Mira and Dan,

    Last night I was with a friend who doesn’t have a monthly pass so we walked from Victory Square, through the DTES, (looking good btw) and up to Commercial because we didn’t want Translink to get his $2.50. LOL………..it was such a beautiful stroll. Took us two hours because we stopped and talked to people and took in the view and noted the beauty that is coming back to Main and Hastings. Thanks Translink, I got my exercise and a few good memories last night.

  • MB

    Many G8 and some developing jurisdictions are investing widely in transit, despite the world economic trends of the last few years.

    Canada isn’t one of them.

    The global rail industry is defying the slumping economy.

    Governments are investing heavily in public transportation in spite of the pressure to crunch their budgets in the age of austerity. And few companies are cashing in on the trend more than Bombardier Inc.

    The Montreal aerospace company’s rail division, one of the top three players in the global industry, is reporting rising sales even in the recession-stricken euro zone and enjoying a surge in North America, where a rail revival is under way.

    BT’s ,order backlog stands at $31.9-billion (U.S.), the largest in the global industry, as cities become weary of favouring automobiles over rail. In car-mad North America, traditionally a slow market for any rail company, BT’s order backlog hit $6.5-billion by mid-2012, up from $4.4-billion at the start of the year.

    […]

    “Demand for passenger rail was scarcely affected by the recent economic downturn,” and even the freight sector has recovered quickly, said a rail study by Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, […]

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/bombardier-riding-a-rail-revival/article4555435/

  • Dan Cooper

    @Raingurl

    Woot!

  • Raingurl

    @ Dan……woot woot! yesterday I lent my pass to someone. Saved him 5 bucks on a round trip. (Did I say that out loud?) LOL

  • Rachel

    No private company should have the power and authority that translink does.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransLink_(British_Columbia)#2007_reorganization

    The city needs to reclaim control of its own transit and the revenue earned. The buses/trains look like something out of a ghetto movie. The zone fares are ridiculous and almost offensive in what a blatant cash grab they are. Have a flat fare to travel in/through ALL zones, like most cities do. To be honest, I had no idea about the “$5 Airport Zone” until looking at this zone map.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:TransLink-FareMap-20091108.svg&page=1

    Translink recently proposed a 30 million property tax hike that would be coming out of your pocket, gentle reader lol (adding around $20 to everyones property tax), yet a recent audit on Translink shows they have $98 million in savings, and an additional $41 million that they “forgot” to declare.

    Maybe translink should use some of that $138 million that they have earned off of the citizens, instead of raising said citizens taxes.

    Better yet, maybe Translink should hit the road.