Frances Bula header image 2

Office-tower developers continue to love transit and Vancouver downtown

September 16th, 2013 · 165 Comments

Two new office-tower projects, to add to the I’ve-lost-count number already. I still can’t get over how much the commercial broker/office developer cluster is bullish on downtown and transit, after having been so hot on business parks for so many years.

These two are interesting, as well, because they’re taking advantage of space that’s not really empty lots: a parkade in one, the plaza of an existing office tower for another.

 

Categories: Uncategorized

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    …well screw that. Apparently when I upgraded to ios7 it wiped my booty call presets address list on google maps in my car and I don’t have any of their addresses written down! F U APPLE!!!

  • Chris Keam

    “With the dwindling volume of cars and drivers coming into the city we keep hearing about, doesn’t sound like the push for a tunnelled Skytrain to UBC is all that necessary anymore, despite the insistence of the city’s director of transportation.”

    The buses I observed were quite full. It was the road space that was being underutilized from my observation.

  • Chris Keam

    @Threadkiller:

    I’ve made no conclusions. I made an observation and suggested that there may be other solutions beyond paving more land to deal with the movement of goods and people. My observation was neither ‘random’ or ‘isolated’. Roads sit empty most of the time. This is obvious to anyone who wishes to look.

    cheers,
    CK

  • Chris Keam

    Threadkiller:

    When you say:
    “The picture you describe is nowhere near as clear-cut as you seem to imagine.”

    the only conclusion I can reach is that you didn’t note the only real suggestion I made in my post:

    “committing large amounts of public money and resources to a ‘pave everything’ approach should be given greater analysis.”

    and I am reminded that it’s largely pointless to voice anything outside of sarcasm or orthodox thought on an Internet forum, because someone will have a conniption and start framing their rebuttal without bothering to ensure they even understood the original point.

    So, a good lesson on a Monday morning.

    cheers, (again)
    CK

  • jenables

    Well Chris you were quite quick to dismiss not only my information regarding the Georgia viaduct, but my father’s memories of actually using the old viaduct, when you were still a twinkle in your father’s eye. Dare I say that set a bit of precedent for you when it comes to anecdote? More to the point, I think we really need to stop looking at already paved roads as a waste of space. They aren’t a waste of space. They are public land that should be used for transport. I’m not suggesting we pave everything, but well used and already paved infrastructure does need to be kept up. Case in point; the burrard street bridge. After using it daily for years, the last six months I have only driven over occasionally, usually at night. Here’s my anecdote – it is looking beat these days. Shouldn’t it be upgraded before the south end is rearranged?

  • Bill

    @Chris Keam

    Vancouver is the second most traffic congested city in North America yet we reduce road capacity in favour of bicycles, a mode of transportation used by a small minority. This is very Progressive.

  • Chris Keam

    Current conditions at Cambie/Broadway a good example of what I’m talking about. Lots of empty road space.

    http://former.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/streets/roadwork/cambieBroadway.htm

  • Threadkiller

    @jenables #105:
    You are correct. the Burrard Bridge is looking “beat”. For well over a year now there have been nets strung under the Burrard Bridge above the heavily-travelled bike/ped path that passes the fish docks and marina (Kitsilano side) and passes under the bridge. The nets are there, ostensibly, to catch falling “debris”– reportedly several largish (grapefruit-sized) chunks of concrete have fallen off that part of the underbelly of the bridge in the past couple of years, narrowly missing people. Whether or not those nets would successfully catch said debris is a moot point. Everytime we walk under there, we quicken our pace.

    It’s obvious that the Burrard bridge is in need of an overhaul and seismic upgrade. Reportedly the City is looking at the possibility. Given the bridge’s concrete structure, it may prove to be more expensive to upgrade than the Granville bridge, which for the past few months has been receiving its second seismic upgrade in the past 15 years (the City have yet to upgrade the Granville’s on- and off-ramps, however, and has no plans to do so in the foreseeable future). Be that as it may, if the City does not embark on an upgrade soon and the Big One finally hits, we may be speaking of the Burrard Dam instead of the Burrard Bridge. And for such a lovely old structure that would be a terrible shame.

  • teririch

    @jenables and Threadkiller:

    I tweeted and posted pics of the slow and painful death of the Burrard Street Bridge well over a year ago now. If you walk it, you will see the concreate on the posts broken down to the rebar -of which the city took some grey paint and sprayed.

    I am somewhat sure at one point there were monies set aside for reparis to the bridge – going back to 2007/2008 – no idea what happened to that plan.

    That bridge is a true jewel and I enjoy watching tourists snap photos of it.

    It is absolutely shameful that it is being left to rot.

    (Sadly) funny how bike lanes can be resurected and or painted green faster than anything else in this city.

    Right now there are no ‘concrete’ lines painted in at the intersection atWest 4th and MacDonald – they are more chalked in – the lines are very faint which includes the crosswalks (4 cossings) Cars stop in a variety of places as they cannot see an absolute line. With the dark weather and the rain, I am waiting for someone to get hit. It has been this way since the city replaced the sewer lines back in June/July. You know, before ‘the vote’ to close Point Grey Road in August which would have changes made to that intersection to inlcude a left turn lane. Just sayin’.

  • Boohoo

    How about knight street being repaved recently… so much money is wasted on bike lanes by this crazy mayor…

    Right? I mean that had to be for bike lanes right?

  • teririch

    @Boohoo #110

    Take a walk around the downtown core and look at the newly painted ‘green’ lanes for bikes.

    Meanwhile, other basics get left unattended.

    So, yup, it is about bike lanes – a great deal of the time.

  • Bill McCreery

    Chris will remember we had another aspect of this conversation a few years back.

    One the probable reasons the concrete has been spalling off the Burrard Bridge since late 2010, early 2011 is because of the added static dead load that was added to the bridge in 2010 from the concrete dividers the City Engineering Department used on both sides of the bridge to create the separated bike lanes. This, combined with the aging concrete, which gets brittle over time (+/-80 years old), has caused increased stress to the concrete and, coincidentally it starts to fail. With concrete of such an age, very little added constant load can cause such failure.

    You will also recall before the bike lanes there were earlier bike lane proposals and debates that included heritage advocates, as well as the bike lobby that were stymied. It makes one wonder whether some in City Hall may have a Plan ‘C’ and are deliberately allowing the bridge to continue to fail by not doing timely maintenance. This will result at a certain point in time in the structure becoming to far gone and, whadaya know, taxpayers will be told they need to pay for a new bridge.

    Does anyone have further thoughts?

  • Kirk

    Hey! We made it to about 100 posts before fighting about bike lanes! Not too shabby. We’re getting better! Congratulations everybody!

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    It’s the equivalent of Godwin’s law on these comment threads – just embrace it.

    You can google Godwin’s law if you don’t know the reference.

  • jenables

    I should have mentioned in what I said earlier that while I usually drive over it at night as of late, I recently went over in the daytime and really noticed that the deck, well the whole top was looking noticeably more ragged than earlier this year. A couple of years ago when I was driving to work I had a small chunk (luckily!!) fall off what I can only assume was the second arch and hit my windshield. This was not kicked up by traffic in front of me, it fell on me just past the arch, presumably carried by the wind/traffic? a short distance. It only left a tiny mark, but that was a few years ago and I don’t recall them ever doing anything but change the banners on the bridge since then.

    Ps- icydk boo knight street is a major truck route that all types of heavy machinery pound daily. It is also a massive hill. Trust me, you WANT them keeping that road in shape. During snowmaggedeon I gave them hell for not plowing a truck route with significant grade, the guy almost had hung up then he said… wait, which end of knight would you say needs plowing more? I said if I was selfish, of course it would be the Clark Dr north end but addressing the grade from 41st to 12th made more sense.

  • jenables

    Ps Teri, I feel your frustration. I have asked them repeatedly to remove the zebra crosswalk at Adanac and commercial because there are now (non pedestrian controlled, regular cycling, equal length of time for each) lights and pedestrian signals there. Not to mention dividers in the middle of the street so cars can’t turn left, dividers on part of Adanac so cars can’t turn right wb, and a no right turn sign for cars going eb on Adanac. The zebra crosswalk just confuses people and while I used to stop for people at it, I don’t anymore if I have a green light. No one seems to know what I am talking about though. Much like dangerous low hanging tree branches blocking signs, I feel they think they have bigger fish to fry than the things that are their actual jobs, I have never had success reporting anything dangerous. I should just start lying and pretending I’m a cyclist.

  • Chris Keam

    I have to say the remarks suggesting people don’t know where to stop at a major signaled intersection without lines on the road and are confused by crosswalk markings really does suggest that clear and prominent indicators of how to share road space are probably a good idea. I should note that I drove down 4th last week and seemed perfectly capable of positioning my vehicle appropriately at the Macdonald intersection without the aid of thick white lines and I’m apparently a moron according to some. Naturellement, I’m very confused and left wondering how I can manage not to encroach on a crosswalk, but avid motorists would lack this ability? People talk about cyclists’ needing education (and it is a good idea)… but judging by the comments in this thread, one might think there also needs to be greater emphasis on educating drivers as to road markings and responsibilities.

  • boohoo

    jenables,

    I know it’s a truck route. The point is the exaggerations here about all the money going to bike lanes are ridiculous, that was my point in being ridiculous.

  • jenables

    Oh Chris..
    No, it’s just stupid to have two conflicting traffic markings in one place if you have a reflex for either of them which anyone using the road should. Not to mention they determine a percentage of fault in the event of an accident, and again, your anecdotal experience does not mean the lines should not be there, nor that people driving are mentally deficient for expecting them. Signaled intersection = no zebra crosswalk as it is confusing to both parties I.e. car sees zebra stripes and subconsciously, green light. Car starts to stop for pedestrians, the traffic in the opposite direction sees green light, isn’t expecting pedestrians to be in the middle of the road, do you follow why that is a dangerous scenario? I’d rather cross a street where the crosswalk was delineated properly than not; do you agree with that? Perhaps you should consider what you are arguing for… we all know common sense is anything but!

  • Threadkiller

    I’m in full agreement with TOAB in #100 when he suggests that a major re-think is needed re the proposed Broadway corridor rapid transit line. If that corridor is as lightly travelled as Chris Keam keeps saying, then all it needs is an increase in rapid bus (B-line) service, with full-time dedicated lanes in the busiest sections. It will probably still take noisy whiners like Geoff Meggs 35 minutes (horrors!) to get from Broadway Station to UBC, but at least they may have a place to sit and catch up on their texting. Take the $3 billion that will thereby have been saved and put it into health care. The people of this province need a substantial increase in the number of doctors, hospital beds and MRI machines a hell of a lot more than UBC students need their own dedicated rapid transit to enable them to get to school faster.

    (Yes, I know that the transit line is merely a smokescreen for Vision’s grand scheme of vastly increased density along the length of Broadway and in its contiguous neighbourhoods, with equally vast increases in the tax base, but I’m pretending to take their altruistic BS about subways at face value.)

  • boohoo

    @120

    Surely you mean the BC Liberals smokescreen? http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/transit_plan/

    I mean you couldn’t possibly be blaming Vision for something they don’t have control over, could you?

  • Frank Ducote

    Bill McC@112 – According to a source who should know, the spalling has been happening for 20+- years but needed maintenance has been inexplicably deferred. Not sure if the barriers have worsened the situation or not.

  • Threadkiller

    @boohoo:
    Robertson & Assoc. have been doing a more vigourous, high-profile job of selling the proposal than anyone else. Given that, it seems only logical to take potshots at the tempting target they present. We can work out the identity of true villains of the piece, and the level of blame to be attached to each, in due course.

  • Chris Keam

    @Jenables:

    “Perhaps you should consider what you are arguing for…”

    Hmm, I’d be interested to know what you think I’m arguing ‘for’. I sense you’ve missed my point. You might also double check the BC MVA re: zebra crosswalks, I have a funny feeling it might be instructive. Certainly the idea that people might be driving ‘subconsciously’ is terrifying enough to make me be glad for the bright green paint and barriers that offer some small protection from those who motor without their full attention to the road.

    @Threadkiller:
    “If that corridor is as lightly travelled as Chris Keam keeps saying”

    Again, I think the point was missed.

    and

    “it seems only logical to take potshots at the tempting target they present ”

    is an eye-opener of a statement. Would that we could have a discussion about infrastructure that wasn’t motivated by politics or behaviour that so sadly resembles that of the schoolyard bully.

  • Chris Keam

    @Threadkiller (again)

    Perhaps you misspoke when you seemed to suggest dedicated bus lanes and accompanying service on Broadway could be done for $0.00?

    “Take the $3 billion that will thereby have been saved”

  • jenables

    You misunderstand, Chris. It was a marked crosswalk with zebra stripes before. It is now a signaled intersection where half of the time the light is red. I meant when I have a green light, and the pedestrians have a hand which means “don’t cross” I know that the light is green (perhaps subconscious was the wrong word to use) but I still think I should stop because I see people at a marked crosswalk. Am I clear? There is now a traffic light there where there was only a zebra crossing before. Or are you suggesting if I have a green light I should stop anyways even though they have a DON’T WALK hand, and I’m sending them into the traffic going the opposite direction of me that has a green light? Can you see how this is a problem and has nothing to do with me not paying attention? For the record, I have a perfect drivers abstract and have never had any points deducted, no speeding tickets, nothing…I AM paying attention.

  • jenables

    The issue is with the zebra stripes. They should paint in regular lines like every other signaled intersection. I live a block away and I’ve watched it happen to others whose instincts are to stop at a zebra crossing when pedestrians are waiting. That’s called paying attention to the edges of the road as well as what is directly in front. Except the light is green!

  • Chris Keam

    “You misunderstand, Chris.”

    Umm, no. I didn’t. I know exactly what you meant. As I say, it may be instructive to find out a bit more about the rules around zebra crosswalks.

    “The crosswalks marked with solid rectangle bars across the street are called “zebra” crosswalks and are used by the ministry added emphasis for the pedestrian crossing is required. This includes mid-block cross-walks, unsignalized cross-walks crossing the highway, and crosswalks near schools where there is a high number of children crossing the road.

    Zebra Crosswalk
    Municipalities may also use zebra crosswalks, and may establish their own policies as to when and where they use them. In some locations motorists will see wide spread use of zebra crosswalks, compared to ministry roads or other jurisdictions.”

    http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/popular-topics/faq.htm

  • jenables

    I note none of those locations include signaled (or is it signalized) intersections because it is obviously confusing and dangerous if there is an expectation of right of way when you are facing a HAND and the car has a green light. Solution: use the same crosswalk as all the other signaled intersections. Again, what are you arguing for?

  • jenables

    Other than trying to make the case that I’m negligent and distracted and don’t know the rules of the road..at an intersection which received traffic signals because, I swear to you, the planner told me that some cyclists had said they didn’t know they were supposed to stop at the stop sign, but they did know to stop at red lights. How I wish I’d recorded that call.

  • Chris Keam

    I can’t say I find it confusing or dangerous… certainly not arguing for anything other than due care and attention. There are certainly examples of zebra stripes and control lights to be found beyond the one example you provide.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/Intersection_4way_overview.jpg

  • Chris Keam

    “some cyclists had said they didn’t know they were supposed to stop at the stop sign”

    Yep, like the many motorists who are unaware they must abide by the stop sign at a ped activated crosswalk, regardless of whether the walk light is activated. Lots of room for education. I have no idea if you are negligent and distracted other than by your own comments. As to whether you know the rules of the road… couldn’t speak to that either. In fact… I know this is hard to believe for those who are here to practice politics, I’m not trying to catch you out or make you look foolish, just trying to ensure good information is being conveyed and people are being safe when they use the roads.

  • jenables

    Yep, I know that rule too. Doesn’t apply at all here as there is no stop sign and it is not pedestrian controlled, but remember this?

    http://www.straight.com/news/police-traffic-violation-crackdown-rankles-vancouver-cyclists

    And from that article, this?

    Vision Vancouver councillor and avid cyclist Geoff Meggs told the Straight, “I was, to be honest, unaware that cyclists couldn’t cross with a walk sign.”

    But I digress, again and again. Your pic shows a random intersection not in Vancouver, likely not in bc. Not only that, it again doesn’t fit in with the provincial use of these crosswalks you posted above. If the city wants to confuse people regarding pedestrian crossings, I’m going to complain about it because inconsistency is unsafe and unnecessary. Just making sure you are safe.

  • Chris Keam

    Oh geez. I guess I better repost:

    “Zebra Crosswalk
    Municipalities may also use zebra crosswalks, and may establish their own policies as to when and where they use them. In some locations motorists will see wide spread use of zebra crosswalks, compared to ministry roads or other jurisdictions.”

    One should have zero expectation that road markings will be consistent across the province/country/world. Further, I made no claim the picture was from BC, but used it to support the statement I did make.

  • Threadkiller

    @C. Keam, #125:
    Now how did I know you were going to say that?? Fine, make it $2.75 billion. What-ever. My point remains. How’s that collection of nits coming along?

    Re # 124: “Would that we could have a discussion about infrastructure that wasn’t motivated by politics or behaviour that so sadly resembles that of the schoolyard bully.”

    So let me see if you understand you. In your world, one cannot criticize the public statements of those in power without being accused of bullying tactics? Got news for ya, CK: The Marquis of Queensbury done packed up and left town. As Phil Ochs memorably sang, it’s important to keep kicking up a fuss “…until the giant is aware that someone’s pulling at his leg”.

    Anyway, if you think many of Robertson & Meggs’ recent statements on infrastructure have variously not been motivated in part or in whole by politics, I have several large bridges I’d love to sell you.

  • Chris Keam

    “So let me see if you understand you. In your world, one cannot criticize the public statements of those in power without being accused of bullying tactics?”

    If that’s how you read it, then no, you don’t understand me. It’s the juvenile name-calling that I find kind of sad really. Leads to things like this:

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57604412-93/popular-science-silences-its-comments-section/

  • Teririch

    I watched the news coverage surrounding the protest at city hall last night, and the comment made by Cllr Reimer on the discourse – that council is acting on city staffs recommendations to move forward versus revisiting or delaying projects. Last I knew ‘city staff’ were not elected to represent the people, so why are are the being granted power to institute these decisions???

  • gman

    jenables was on Global at noon today,it looked like a pretty good turnout.

  • Teririch

    @gman:. I am out of town work or I would have been there.

  • Terry M

    Teririch @137
    Reimer’s discourse is pure BS!
    And she knows it!
    City staff cannot talk to the press, without permission from Herr Ballem, as per her Vision Vancouver instructions, but they can make recommendations on their own?
    Woahahahahaha…

  • Teririch

    @TerryM:

    Oh, I had a pretty good chuckle over ‘that’ disclosure. Sad to see cllrs throw the workers to the lions; hide behind their skirt tails in attempts to divert the heat. Cowards. And I can’t help notice our ‘good’ mayor has been noticeably absent for comment as of late. Love or hate Toronto’s Ford, he is not media or people shy.

  • jenables

    Ahh, I was!? Well they did interview me I just didn’t think they’d use it! I was thinking Daammn I should have put some makeup on! It was a great rally, saw some familiar faces, met some online personas and commiserated. Everyone was very unified in their sentiment, and the speakers were great. Lots of people honking as they drove by too.

  • waltyss

    Well, isn’t it rich indeed that teri the rich would be a fan of the coke snorting thug Ford. He would be your kind of guy. Somehow I am not surprised.

  • Bill McCreery

    Frank D. @ 122.

    You may recall that the City put nets up to catch the debris in 2010. According to my source, who works below the bridge as well as a boat owner at the Burrard Marina, the frequency sharply increased after the dividers went up. Hence, the nets. But, as you said, no maintenance. Why not?

  • jenables

    Ps keam, I said provincial use. Even you can probably agree that at least throughout the province road signs/markings should be consistent and mean the same things given that the province does the licensing. If it was widespread use, it wouldn’t be confusing, would it? Can you copy and paste the policy cov has established to have this one wonky zebra crossing (as it is only one of four possible sides at the intersection, unlike your picture) with a non pedestrian controlled traffic light?

  • Threadkiller

    Waltyss, #143:
    I realize you’re hell-and-determined to make outrageously stupid statements as part of your pathologically obsessive anti-Teririch campaign, but interpreting her neutral observation on Rob Ford in #141 as “fandom” represents a new low, even by your abysmal standards.

  • waltyss

    Believe what you will Threadkiller. If you think that teri the rich was not expressing fandom of Rob Ford, I have a bridge to sell you. The rest of your post is not worthy of response.

  • Teririch

    @waltyss:

    How much is that bridge; I thought I might gift it to Threadkiller.

    Perhaps we can toll it and buy you a nicer personality.

  • Frank Ducote

    Bill McC @144: “But, as you said, no maintenance. Why not?”

    Great question. Alas, I dunno the answer. It’d be nice to have a city official or an InsiderEngineer to tell us, or else we’re left to speculate.

  • Chris Keam

    @jenables
    “Even you can probably agree that at least throughout the province road signs/markings should be consistent and mean the same things given that the province does the licensing”

    Absolutely. Is there somewhere in the province where zebra striping across a roadway doesn’t indicate a crosswalk?

    “Can you copy and paste the policy cov has established to have this one wonky zebra crossing”

    Nope.

    It’s a previously uncontrolled crosswalk that has had lights added. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist or someone with NASCAR level driving skills to figure it out IMO.