Frances Bula header image 2

NPA drops acclaimed candidate, some bow out, but others revving up to run

April 26th, 2011 · 43 Comments

Jesse Johl, we hardly knew you. For those who don’t recall, Johl was acclaimed as one of two NPA candidates acclaimed to run in the November election last fall, as a way of giving some support to lone councillor Suzanne Anton.

Bill McCreery, the other acclaimed candidate, has been busy peppering blogs, emails and live events with his presence, giving his opinions on political developments, nipping at Vision, and generally doing what a pre-election candidate should do. Johl, apparently not so much.

NPA president John Moonen told me today that the board has voted not to approve Johl’s candidacy, because he kind of disappeared after the acclamation.

“He wasn’t communicating, he wasn’t replying to correspondence or emails, he wasn’t attending training sessions. He didn’t seem all that engaged, said Moonen.

I was a bit surprised by this turn of events, as I’d always thought once a candidate was voted in or acclaimed, they were there until the election was over.

But Moonen says no, the party can choose at any time to disallow someone from running. Same could happen with those voted in in June. As we all know these days, things keep popping up during campaigns that have been unearthed from Facebook or bankruptcy records, so I guess nothing is a for sure any more.

In the meantime, though, other candidates are starting to emerge for the NPA. I went to Mike Klassen’s announcement last week, in a small art-supply room at the Roundhouse Community Centre, with excellent muffins supplied by his mother. His speech is here so you know what he had to say.

I’ll be interested to see how Mike turns out as a candidate. In his blog posts on CityCaucus, he can seem nasty and partisan. In person, he’s much more likely to talk about community gardening or long-term city planning, as I’ve noted on the occasions when we’ve gone out for a gab and lunch. It seems like it’s the latter incarnation who is going to be campaigning, from his speech.

He was asked one question by the faithful, about whether he would have approved a casino expansion. His answer was roundabout. It’s a moot point, he said, since Paragon will be long gone by the time November elections happen so there’ll be no point voting for an expansion.

The room was filled with people planning their run for an NPA position. Among them:

– Elizabeth Ball, on council with Sam Sullivan and trying for another run

– George Affleck, a public-relations consultant for whom I have a soft spot. He’s a Langara journalism grad and has a long-time affiliation with community newspapers. He lives downtown, loves the city, expresses thoughtful ideas about the place, families, the people who live here when I talk to him.

– Sean Bickerton, the neighbourhood guy from near the casino who helped kickstart the anti-casino movement.

– Francis Wong, a Chinatown businessman

– Bill Yuen, a former school-board trustee planning to run again

– Melissa de Genova, who won the vote to run for park board

– Joe Carangi, a lawyer who will be trying to get a council slate seat. I don’t know Joe at all, but here’s a YouTube video of him announcing his candidacy

– Not at the meeting but two others who will be running for park board for the NPA: John Coupar, who helped save the Bloedel Conservatory, and Dave Pasin, who has been an NPA board member.

Others in the crowd included former mayor Sam Sullivan, for whom Klassen did a lot of web work, MLA Colin Hansen, for whom Klassen worked on campaigns,

Who won’t be joining the crowd include:

– Rob Macdonald, the developer whose outrage over bike lanes and poor business decisions at council is well-known, as is his predliction for speaking his mind in blistering terms from time to time. Although I haven’t been told personally he’s not running, others say he called various associates two weeks ago and said he was out. Civic journalists are in some mourning, as Macdonald would have provided unmistakeable fireworks.

– Rick Peterson, the former journalist and investment counsellor who tried to run for the B.C. Liberal nomination in Fairview at one point but lost to Margaret McDiarmid. Another strong candidate. But, he says, his business is not at a point where he could leave it.

Moonen says there are still four candidates talking about running as the NPA mayoral candidate, though. And more for other positions to declare themselves to the NPA, though not necessarily us out here in media land, by May 4

Categories: Uncategorized

  • gmgw

    Even the exceedingly slim prospect of Elizabeth Ball returning to council is enough to make me want to run screaming into the trees.
    gmgw

  • Glissando Remmy

    The Thought of The Night

    “It’s a West Side Story, ladies and gents. The NPA are the Jets. Vision are the Sharks. And I feel like L. B. “Jeff” Jeffries in Hitchcock’s ‘Rear Window’. I suspect murder.”

    The dog is buried inside the compost bin. Meggs is the salesman. Ballem is the ballerina. Suzanne is the lonely-heart woman. Magee is the songwriter. Lisa de Genova plays herself.

    I would like to send a few greeting cards.

    To Jesse Johl:
    “Get well soon. For the size of your balls, itchiness shouldn’t be a problem.”

    To NPA:
    “We’ll have to stop meeting like this – so, you are engaged to be married then.”

    To Vision:
    “Love is -never having to say, ‘How much?’…but, if it’s organically fund-raised, well then…”

    You’re all welcome! Don’t call me. I’ll call you.

    We live in Vancouver and this keeps us busy.

  • Everyman

    Rob Macdonald is out? Pity. Heaven forbid we should have a politician that speaks his mind, instead of merely regurgitating doublespeak.

  • jaymac

    Everyman is right. Rob has an uncanny way for cutting out the smalltalk and confronting the issue. I guess this scares people. Shame.

  • spartikus

    Rob has an uncanny way for cutting out the smalltalk and confronting the issue

    Like the all important task of rooting out “Marxists, Leninists, Trotskyites, Maoists and Castroites.”

    Truly a man for all seasons.

  • boohoo

    “He wasn’t communicating, he wasn’t replying to correspondence or emails, he wasn’t attending training sessions. He didn’t seem all that engaged, said Moonen.”

    What exactly is an NPA training session?

    It all sounds like blah blah blah more of the same.

  • Max

    Macdonald would have been a welcomed contender.

    As for his rant on bike lanes, there was an op ed piece on the Vancouver Observor site, under bike bytes on ‘Why aren’t more people using bike lanes’. Seems to be a’universal’ question.

  • Sandy Garossino

    What is the NPA defining purpose and vision? I don’t know.

    A concern for all levels of government is that our primary tool for navigating a challenging future is not a map or GPS, but a rear-view mirror. Vancouver is both a witness to and participant in at least two concurrent revolutions with profound implications for our lived environment and urban economy–the shift of political and economic power from America to Asia, and the massive change attendant on technological and telecommunications advances.

    These forces will profoundly shape Vancouver for the rest of our lives.

    Hoping to see all the parties demonstrate a grasp and strategy for the coming times.

  • spartikus

    Vancouver is both a witness to and participant in at least two concurrent revolutions with profound implications for our lived environment and urban economy

    I would add the end of the age of oil to the list.

  • rf

    “Like the all important task of rooting out “Marxists, Leninists, Trotskyites, Maoists and Castroites.””—

    You make it out like that’s a dirty thing!

    When half of your income gets taxed at 43.7%, you will think they are dirty too.

    The misconception of the socialists is that someone making $150k (without a pension) is loaded. Put away $35k/year for savings (to have any chance of matching the $40k/year pensions the unioners get at age 55), then get whacked at a 50% higher tax rate, you end up in the same place as the $70k union job……. and working an extra 5 years.

    It’s amazing how the NDP claims some sort of moral majority of working people….yet they’ve never had more than 23% of the federal vote.

    Do the other 77% of us not work? Are “working families” only 18% (last election) of the country?

    If everyone is on the teet….who pays?

    ———
    “I would add the end of the age of oil to the list.”—

    (Yawn)

  • spartikus

    Hey rf, long time no hear!

    Hmmm…where to begin? There’s a lot in MacDonald’s comment that’s ridiculous. First, let’s just get it out of the way and mention equating a political party that supports progressive taxation with Marxism, Maoist, etc, etc. One, it’s inaccurate. Words mean things, and Marxism and Maoism have definitions that the NDP past and present does not even remotely meet (Heck, Marxists don’t even like progressive taxation!). Two, it’s not very useful even as an insult. As each major political party supports progressive taxation, you’ve just labelled everyone…you know…a Marxist. It’s a bit of an own goal. But maybe he’s “exaggerating for effect”?

    “[Premier Glen Clark] and his fellow travelers set about to make B.C. their very own socialist utopia, just like Cuba.”

    Er…no, seems like he meant it literally! So that’s why we got fast ferries and the Millenium Line! Carbon copies of those in Cuba!

    I could be quite wrong about this , but MacDonald’s comment comes off as an out of touch rich person whining to other rich people about the slim possibility they might have to share some of their table scraps with the peasantry. It’s not a message I think that would resonate politically, especially now.

    Not to mention when speaking on the economic performance of BC under the NDP he’s completely wrong on the actual facts. Yes, that’s ex-NDP candidate Gabriel Yiu, but he brings the evidence. If you want to dispute with a reasoned supported argument, please do, but please don’t waste my time with airy dismissals.

    The misconception of the socialists is that someone making $150k (without a pension) is loaded.

    They’re not loaded? Wow, that’s unfortunate….as according to the 2006 Census only 6% of the Canadian population earns more than $80k. So people earning $150k+ are fewer still. Canada must be a very impoverished place.

    Let’s look at your other example, the “union worker” earning $70k. Only 3% of Canadians earn b/w 70k-79K and 4% earn b/w 60k-69k. Let’s add the 2 groups together to say your hypothetical union worker represents 7% of the population.

    You’re two examples come from groups that represent only 13% of Canadians. The top 13%.

    About the tax burden. I can’t vouch for the accuracy of this site, but it seems to jive with the Canadian Revenue Agency’s rates so I will use it and be prepared to stand corrected simply because I am terrible with math. So, according to this site our hypothetical $150k earning resident of BC has an after-tax income of $103,582, while our hypothetical $70k earning resident of BC – you seem to have forgotten they pay tax too – has an after-tax income of $55,214. Hmmm.

    According to you you need to sock away an extra $35k/yr for your retirement so that leaves our $150k earner with $68.5k left over after-tax. That’s still $13k more than the $70k earner, and they get the free pension! Is it free? Wait…oh right…they have to contribute too. 6.99%/year if, as I suspect you are suggesting, they work for a municipal government. That 6.99% if off the gross if I’m not mistaken, so that’s $4900/yr and now they are down to $50,314. Still…where’s the incentive to work so hard to earn $150k when you can just lie back and earn a free $50k, eh!

    Hmmm…I think we’ve forgotten CPP contributions, but I think you get the idea.

    Now, does this $35k put aside for our hard up $150k sit under a mattress until age 65? Or…can it be invested…to earn income. A lot of it tax free. Oh right, all that. Next you’ll be telling me it that through the miracle of compound interest your $35k might be a very tidy sum in no time. One could even say it might end up giving them significantly more than $35k/yr. Of course our $70k earner can do the same thing and supplement their post-retirement income. But they get that 40k/yr too! If…according to my calculations…they earn $70k for their entire working career. Which, you know, is often not the case. Also, they contribute to it. Did I mention that?

    It’s amazing how the NDP claims some sort of moral majority of working people….yet they’ve never had more than 23% of the federal vote.

    Funny, I guess you haven’t read the news lately. I could also point out that the Tories also never seem to rise above 30-35% – this despite ruling like Grits for 5 year. Or put another way 65-70% of Canadians vote for parties to the left of the Tories. I believe you might have mentioned some of those hard-working stiffs.

    “I would add the end of the age of oil to the list.”— (Yawn)

    For someone complaining about how hard it is to live on $150k, you don’t seem to be worried about gas hitting $1.50/litre, which it’s forecast too very soon. At that price you don’t have to be a hippie to get out of your car and start thinking about another way to get to work. And it’s only going to go up. And up. And up. And this will affect everything. The way we commute. Food and consumer prices. Everything. But let’s stick our head in the sand and ignore the problem.

  • spartikus

    I have a long link-filled response to rf awaiting moderation, but if you can’t wait – and i know you can’t 🙂 – you can view it here.

  • Max

    @spartikus:

    If the NDP/socialists did such a crack up job, then why did they get virtually annialated in 2001.?

    I mean, if they were doing all that they claimed to have done in the 90’s, – he province was prospering under the NDP and budgets were all on track, labou forces were all happy, education and health were all fabulous, then how is it, they were democratically voted down to two seats?

    And Campbell, with all the issues that surrounded he and the Liberals still managed to put them under for three terms.

    Again, democratically voted in.

    I read a tweet put out by Keith Baldry while attending a political biz luncheon – ‘the business community views Adrian Dix as the anti-christ’.

    I would suggest the NDP looks past their union members and look at the entirety of the Province and all the people they keep referencing that they ‘speak’ for.

    Still, I would severe a limb before voting for them. Unlike what the NDP and Sinclair claim, they don’t speak for ‘all of us’.

  • spartikus

    @Max

    Let me just repeat this for emphasis: If you want to dispute [this] with a reasoned, supported argument, please do, but please don’t waste my time with airy dismissals.

  • Max

    @ Spartikus;

    Right back at you.

  • Max

    I guess history is hard to dispute, perhaps you can suggest to those that have chronicled the past that they not waste your time with ‘airy dismissles’.

    Start with the NDP – some of this info is readily on their site.

  • The Fourth Horseman

    I am feeling very dissassociated from politics right now.

    All parties are on the usual and unsurprising rhetorical track. The narratives have all been written for our leaders and they must play these old parts. They are beholden to their supporters, there is seemingly no abilty to “refresh and surprise” and you have the unpleasant spectre of more of the same, federally, provincially and civically.

    I know this approach works in the cold, cruel world of electioneering, but still, my god, it all feels so old school, even with “surges” and such.

    What have we learned this election? Harper eats babies, Iggy is a loser and Jack sucks the public teat. If I want to watch something intelligent, I guess I have to flip to “Jersey Shore”.

    #cdnpoli and #elxn41 on Twitter are populated by people, who, I suspect, are actually quite smart. But the whole thing has devolved into investive, hysteria and gross over generalizations. Epic fail in 140 characters . Sad thing for social media.

    I wish it wasn’t all so childish. I love the parry and thrust of good argument. But the invention and delivery of real, new and creative, of better ways to try to meet our challenges—and to also invite and re-engage our citizens in the business and DUTIES of nation building– is missing. Combined with the seeming inability for all parities to come up with same, is something that is going to haunt this country, and very soon.

  • The Fourth Horseman

    I see that there ARE others:

    In the House of Commons, partisanship rears its ugly head: http://bit.ly/lvxGZw“.

    I don’t feel quite so alone now. 😉

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Now, does this $35k put aside for our hard up $150k sit under a mattress until age 65? Or…can it be invested…to earn income. A lot of it tax free. Oh right, all that.

    Sparticus, what tax free income?

    I’m only aware of TFSA gains from annual contributions which are capped at $5000, or the sale of the principal residence, but both are susceptible to market fluctuation, as exemplified in the one fell swoop savings meltdown of 2008, and neither guarantee an income till death, or are the sole domain of non-pension vested workers.

  • spartikus

    Sparticus, what tax free income?

    I calculated our 150k earner’s after-tax income without any deductions. Perhaps you would be so kind as to do a new set incorporating all TFSA, RRSP etc, etc. I got the idea that our example was self-employed so perhaps too you could calculate all the ways a self-employed person can reduce their tax bill. Incorporating, paying their hypothetical spouse in dividends and so on.

    Then lets see how much money they have at retirement after contributing 35k/yr (assume a conservative rate of return!). Since our example was presumed to earn 70k for their entire working life, please presume same for our 150k earner.

    If you come up with numbers that dramatically undermine the point…then, and only then, can we break out the tiny violins for Canada’s top 6%.

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    @Sparticus,

    Oh okay, you were speaking about source deductions on wage earnings – not the income from investments. Thanks for clarifying.

    Also, how many years of static earnings to retirement?

  • boohoo

    Anyone? What is an NPA training session?

  • rf

    boohoo……..We’ve seen the pictures from Hollyhock of a Vision training session….

    Top Ten things you won’t see at an NPA training session!

    10. Singing and drum circles.

    9. Bare feet

    8.Pictures of David Suzuki hanging on the wall

    7.Vegetarian options forced on everyone

    6. Gluten free anything

    5. Mom-preneurs promoting their ‘time-saving’ solutions/products between/during sessions

    4. Japanese letter tattoos

    3. ” Gurus” (of any kind)

    2. Hackysacks

    and #1…..drum-roll…….

    1.US citizens!

  • mezzanine

    @spartikus:

    “Not to mention when speaking on the economic performance of BC under the NDP he’s completely wrong on the actual facts. Yes, that’s ex-NDP candidate Gabriel Yiu, but he brings the evidence. If you want to dispute with a reasoned supported argument, please do, but please don’t waste my time with airy dismissals.”
    —————–
    I’ved lived in BC in the 1990s, and from my personal experience i find it hard to believe when anyone tells me the economy was better then. This is from forces from both outside and inside BC, some, not all of victoria’s making.

    Instead of trying to re-write history, the NDP would be better served in how their plans will improve things for the future. However, their stance against the HST is disappointing.

    And the obligatory link, this to stascan[1]

    “The 1990s: A “lost decade”

    After leading Canada’s economic growth from 1984 to 1990, BC fell behind in the 1990s. This was reflected in real GDP growth of only 2.9% per year from 1990 to 2001, down over a full point from the previous period. While BC continued to generate jobs in this decade, many of them were part-time.

    The impact of the slowdown in BC is seen vividly in Figure 2. BC’s real GDP per capita fell from 8% above the average in the rest of Canada in 1992 to 8% below by 2001, after which it began to recover.
    ….
    Starting in 1997, BC’s population growth began to slow markedly. Average annual population growth was close to 3% a year from 1990 to 1996. It initially decelerated to a 1.5% increase in 1997, before slowing to an average of near 1% in the eight years since.

    The reasons for this slowdown owe more to interprovincial than international movements of people. Certainly, the run-up to China’s takeover of Hong Kong did spur a small surge in immigration to BC in the period before 1997.
    The largest reason for the slowdown was fewer people in the rest of Canada migrating to BC (Figure 13). This net inflow slowed noticeably after 1994, turning to a net outflow in 1998, which continued until 2004. Instead, Canadians moved to Ontario during the late 1990s, and more recently to Alberta, attracted by its surging economy.”

  • mezzanine

    http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-010-x/00506/9196-eng.htm

  • spartikus

    Is it fair, when comparing the economic performance of the province under 2 governments, to exclude the worst years of one, while including one of the worst years of a third (Socred) government for the other? I don’t think that’s fair, but that’s me.

    You cite doesn’t actually speak to politics. It doesn’t draw any conclusions on political or fiscal policy. It was, however, written in 2006 – 2 year before the Great Recession. It doesn’t include the “bad years”. It starts in 1990, when Rita Johnston was head honcho.

    By the numbers – all the numbers – the 10 years of the NDP meet and/or exceed the 10 years of the BC Liberals and Socreds respectively.

  • mezzanine

    I try to keep open to new ideas, but the only thing is clear is hindsight, and I remember things like Finning Canada moving head offices from Vancouver to Edmonton. Or a multimillion bailout from victoria to skeena cellulose.

    I purposely tried to keep my #24 apolitical – my point was that my recollection of the 1990s was of a contracting job market and seeing many of my friends move to alberta -the due to factors within and without control from Victoria. If you try to tell me otherwise, i’m gonna call you on it.

  • boohoo

    jeez rf, you just can’t help yourself eh? Typical.

    Anyone actually know? Is there actually such a thing?

  • spartikus

    If you try to tell me otherwise, i’m gonna call you on it.

    No one was disputing that there were difficult years in the 90s. I was disputing the claim that overall economic performance in 00s was better.

    It’s wasn’t. It’s simply wasn’t. It’s the BC Liberals who have rewritten history. Fortunately for historians, we have Statscan and BC Stats.

    As for Finning – you might want to read up on CEO at the time Jim Shepherd and his views on “socialism”. Hint: He feels Barack Obama is imposing “socialism”. Undoubtedly he is moving all his assets out of the United States to a safe, unsocialist haven. Like Russia.

  • mezzanine

    “It’s wasn’t. It’s simply wasn’t. It’s the BC Liberals who have rewritten history. Fortunately for historians, we have Statscan and BC Stats.”

    But what does that mean, exactly? The tyee article that you referenced [1] makes further reference to growth in GDP [2] while not comparing it relavtive to other provinces or jursidictions and with you, me and all the articles also mentioning that many factors outside the control of victoria are a major determinant, like the commodities boom/bust.

    We can go back and forth all day. if we look forward, i am interested in the NDP’s details on a capital tax on financial instituions (but would dread one on non-financial instituitions).

    but again their stance against a VAT-style HST is disappointing. and “green bonds” being a major policy plank last election? [3] that augers poorly for them to guide us thru the new economy [4].

  • Everyman

    By choosing Adrian Dix the NDP have lurched too far to the Left. Look at his shadow cabinet. A huge miscalculation.

    It will be interesting to see which, if any, defeated federal candidates jump into the municpal ring.

  • spartikus

    The tyee article that you referenced [1] makes further reference to growth in GDP [2] while not comparing it relavtive to other provinces or jursidictions

    Yes we could go back and forth all day, but this statement is absolutely false. At the start of the article is chart with BC’s GDP growth superimposed over the rest of Canada’s. It’s whole point is to compare BC with the rest of Canada. It even explicitly says so:

    Probably the easiest way is to examine the growth of B.C.’s economy (as measured by gross domestic product) and compare it to that of Canada as a whole over the same period.

  • mezzanine

    1] http://thetyee.ca/Views/2009/04/23/BCEcon/
    2] http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/data/bus_stat/bcea/bcgdp.asp

    3] http://www.bcndp.ca/newsroom/ndps-green-bond-support-jobs-and-new-green-economy

    4] http://www.urbanophile.com/2010/09/16/theres-no-such-thing-as-green-industry/

  • Ned

    Frances Bula blog is pregnant with child. Vision Endeepee’s child. And man, he’s ugly like hell. And boring.

  • mezzanine

    my bad about the tyee article.

    it doesn’t change the fact that other publications from statscan seem to refute the findings they came to.

    “After leading Canada’s economic growth from 1984 to 1990, British Columbia fell behind in the 1990s. Real gross domestic product per capita fell from 8% above the average in the rest of Canada in 1992 to 8% below by 2002, after which it began to recover.”

    http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/060511/dq060511a-eng.htm

    my second point also still stands.

    “with you, me and all the articles also mentioning that many factors outside the control of victoria are a major determinant, like the commodities boom/bust. ”

    like i said we can go back and forth all day. I am unsure how much success the NDP can get by talking about the 1990s.

  • Bill

    @spartikus #11

    “MacDonald’s comment comes off as an out of touch rich person whining to other rich people about the slim possibility they might have to share some of their table scraps with the peasantry”

    Spoken like a true envious Progressive. How many times do you find yourself the smartest guy in the room yet there are others there that are making more money? Must be on the backs of the proletariat so surely society has the moral right, no duty, to “share” in their wealth. They should be thankful they can keep half. The envious Progressive – you are intelligent, articulate and willing to have less as long as others do not have more.

  • spartikus

    @mezz

    And my point still stands – you can’t compare the 10 years of the NDP and the 10 years of the BC Liberals by excluding the worst years of the latter.

    You article is from 2006. And you also need to reread carefully the reasons for BC falling behind the RoC in the 1990s. Hint: Residential construction and the 1997 Asian Crisis. Look at the Tyee chart again and see how it matches up with your article.

    You’ll notice the correlation.

    @Bill

    Zzzzzz…..

  • rf

    “MacDonald’s comment comes off as an out of touch rich person whining to other rich people about the slim possibility they might have to share some of their table scraps with the peasantry”
    _________

    With a top tax rate of 43.7%……a rate that amounts to likely $100,000’s to someone like MacDonald…. and then paying 12% in consumption taxes on whatever he spends;

    -how do you get off calling it table scraps.

    Sincerely – what is his fair share in your opinion?

    What is the % level of taxation that would make someone like yourself leave high income earners alone?

  • mezzanine

    @spartikus,

    “you can’t compare the 10 years of the NDP and the 10 years of the BC Liberals by excluding the worst years of the latter”

    but can you? And how would you compare? in 2010 gdp dropped in BC, but the RoC , ON and AB dropped even further [1]. is that success of the libs? luck from external forces? the effect of the olympics?
    ….
    “And you also need to reread carefully the reasons for BC falling behind the RoC in the 1990s. Hint: Residential construction and the 1997 Asian Crisis.”

    just say what the discrepency is. correct me if i’m wrong, but you are hinting that extenal forces (asian crisis) were a major driver of the poor economy in the 1990s. and should have less weight, but i am unsure why it is harder for you to make that allowance for the great recession happening currently.

    like i said we can go back and forth on this one. i really am unsure if the NDP can make a resounding arguement with this.

    @rf,

    sorry man, but IMO Rob MacDonald is an out-of-touch, anti-bike lane rich dude. 🙂

  • mezzanine

    http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/101104/dq101104a-eng.htm

  • rf

    I guess by Sparty’s logic, he should also be praising George Bush and giving him credit for the democratic wave taking down dictators in the Middle East and Africa? right? – Oh wait, no one does! Why? Because he was hated at the time and most thought he was the problem.

    It’s a little rich to try and suggest that the Liberals revised BC history about what the NDP did to BC in the 90’s.

    When a party gets taken out to the woodshed (by the voters), and left with 2 seats, it’s a little much to suggest that the liberals are lying about the state of the economy in the 90’s.

    Scenario 1. The national GDP contracts at 1% for 10 years and your province grows at 0.5%.

    Scenario 2. The national GDP grows at 4% for 10 years and your province grows at 1%.

    By Sparty’s theory, Scenario 2 is preferred.

    Relative performance should exist in the revisionist history as well.

  • Bill McCreery

    @ Sandy Garossino 8.

    Sandy here’s some of my answers, as a NPA Council Candidate, to your question about “the NPA’s defining purpose and vision” for this election:

    Neigbourhoods

    • Vancouver has become one of the world’s most admired cities because a ‘livable city’ planning process was developed starting in the 1970s. However, the process has broken recently, and it is no longer working. An NPA Council will work with communities and developers to create safe, green, walkable neighbourhoods.

    • The current Vision Council has a history of top down decision-making and imposing spot rezonings that ignore Community Visions as well as zoning by-laws. It has imposed misguided Downtown Bike Lanes which don’t work, the financially unsustainable Short Term Incentives for Rental housing programme (STIR), and other initiatives with little broad based support and of questionable social value.

    People

    • City business must be conducted in a truly open and transparent manner in order to validate an essential mutual trust and respect.

    • The NPA will encourage the City’s cultural diversity.

    • An NPA Council will work to make Vancouver even more livable, and a world leader as a ‘green’ city.

    Accountability

    • The NPA is fiscally responsible. Your tax dollars will be spent carefully and responsibly.

    • The City will return to the 2008 budgeting process, including a full, descriptive budget document (249 pages in 2008 vs. 6 1/2 pages in 2011).

    • Heavily subsidized programmes, such as STIR, will be terminated. Bike lanes and Laneway Houses will be made to work for all affected stakeholders.

    Issues of the Day

    • The Olympic Village will be managed from a pragmatic, business-like perspective.

    • The Casino spot rezoning has been effectively deferred. Given the Edgewater license is in place, it’s reincarnation could be re-envisioned as a ‘boutique’ casino-hotel operation with a higher ratio of VIP to public slots and tables to attract more off-shore customers, also combining Heli-tours, heli-skiing, Rocky Mountaineer, pocket cruises up the coast, and fishing lodge excursions. This mix may also benefit from more critical mass by including the River Rock and Villa as ’boutique’ casinos. Think smart instead of big.

  • Michael Geller

    I want to thank all the Fabula followers who have urged me over this blogsite, through emails and in person, to run for Council this November… with kind words and encouragement. However, on this, the last day to submit papers as an NPA candidate, I must confirm what I have been telling you for a while….namely that I am not going to run this time around.

    I do believe, however that there are some Vision Councillors who deserve to be reelected, and there are some very good NPA candidates running this time around, and who knows, maybe there will be some excellent independent candidates, as there were last time….so we are likely to have a much better Council.

    In a later post, I will share the reasons why I decided not to run…but that will have to wait. In the meanwhile, I will continue to speak out when I see what I consider to be injustices and downright stupid decisions….check out City Caucus today to see an example of this! cheers