Frances Bula header image 2

Mayors give province an ultimatum on coming up with new transit-funding plan, but unclear what leverage they have

October 19th, 2012 · 57 Comments

With mayors uncertain yesterday whether to delay any decision about cancelling a two-year property-tax increase for TransLink or to go through with cancelling it instantly, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson swooped in with what’s being called a compromise motion.

The motion, which got enough votes to pass thanks to co-operation from Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts, warns the province that if its officials don’t sit down with TransLink and work out a long-term deal by Feb. 28, 2012, the mayors will cancel the property tax.

But the motion also says they’re going to cancel it no matter what. So I’m not sure exactly how this puts Transportation Minister Mary Polak’s feet to the fire, except to keep the issue at a full boil until just weeks before the election. But since NDP Leader Adrian Dix has declined, despite much prodding, to say what the NDP’s plan for TransLink funding is, hard to see how this is much of a wedge issue.

Anyway, there is probably some deep political strategy here that I’m totally missing. In the meantime, Robertson’s full motion is attached below here.

That the Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation:

1.    Request that the Translink Board develop by March 31, 2013 a 2013 Supplemental Plan that meets the following conditions:

a.   No service reductions for transit routes;

b.   No liquidation of capital assets to fund operations;

c.    No inclusion of the time-limited property tax. A new funding model must be agreed upon with the BC government by February 28, 2013;

d.   Any operating gap is closed with funds from Translink’s reserves.

2.    The Mayors’ Council bring forward a framework for a long-term funding plan by January 31, 2013

3.    The Mayors Council write to the Minister of Transportation requesting we create a joint working group immediately to develop solutions and that a deadline of February 28, 2013 be set for the BC Government and Translink Mayors’ Council to reach an agreement on a long-term funding model.

4.    That in the event that a new funding model is not confirmed by February 28, 2013, a new supplement be prepared at that time.

 

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Chris Keam

    @IanS:

    Just to be perfectly clear… you think it’s a real possibility the gov’t might stop funding public transit? Based upon what? I can’t think of any evidence that this is something they would consider.

  • IanS

    @Chris Keam #51,

    Not stop funding transit, but reduce funding maybe. Or not increase funding fast enough to meet demand.

  • Julia

    Roger #50 I am a paid kibitzer? Please let me know where I can pick up my cheque!

  • Roger Kemble

    You have cheque mated yourself Julia # @53.

    I cannot help you!

  • MB

    @ Roger 50, let me assure you my opinions are free.

  • Oakridge

    How hard is it to just raise my property taxes to pay for all this? Seems simple enough. They’re much lower than I paid in Toronto.

    The reason is the regional mayors are scared of the political accountability for raising taxes to pay for regional priorities. This suggests to me that perhaps they know the people aren’t behind it. Oh well that’s democracy. So be it. Seems more fair than a regional competition for one-off gifts from the province or other provincial funding schemes that will end up in higher income taxes for the whole province.

    Maybe they should do some polling to figure out what will be supported rather than just crying to mommy for help.

  • MB

    @ Oakridge:

    Maybe they should do some polling to figure out what will be supported rather than just crying to mommy for help.

    Governing by polls? We’ll have Guinness in the taps and the homeless, noisy neighbours, unwed moms and debtors incarcerated in Triangle island before you know it.

    Actually, I could live with shipping off my obnoxious neighbours.