Frances Bula header image 2

East Hastings project demonstrates new way to create social housing units, but draws criticism from DTES groups

October 16th, 2012 · 14 Comments

As my Globe story today says, the project at public hearing tonight from Wall Financial represents the city’s new solution to creating social housing.

Wall Financial is proposing a building at 955 East Hastings that consists of two floors of industrial space in the old Alex Gair building, and 352 condos, of which 70 will be turned over to the city.

Vancouver used to demand that developers reserve 20 per cent of their land for social housing in mega-projects, with the idea that money from provincial and federal housing budgets would provide the construction dollars for whatever building eventually went up. That money has disappeared. The feds ended their funding of basic social housing in 1994. The province is now concentrating only on social housing for people with the most serious disabilities. It has put money into Downtown Eastside residential hotels and 14 new buildings around the city. There’s no more for low-cost housing for just regular people who happen to not earn very much money.

The city is now focused on trying to extract units from developers as the benefit in various new projects in order to build up the pool of housing stock that can be rented out, some with a deep subsidy (so renting at welfare rates), a shallow subsidy (for working people who don’t have very high incomes) and at market rates. That’s the model that used to be used for social housing in all buildings, until the recent focus on only the poorest of the poor by the province.

That means less money available for other things the city used to use its cut of developer profits for. But the Vision council has decided this is the priority for the moment.

As I write, it’s 9:30 p.m. on Sept. 16 and the hearing on this project hasn’t started yet. There’s a raft of speakers set to speak, but I can’t imagine we’ll see council get through many of them tonight. So decision to come much later.

 

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Mark Guslits

    In spite of DTES group’s concerns, I’m just amazed Wall are willing to do this at all. Many developers would suggest that this idea ( of placing social housing units within a sectional title/condo building) is a non starter as a board (condo board) would never agree to this and purchasers would be hard to find. I’ve always thought that was in fact a realistic concern of developers and am impressed to see the methodology potentially being applied here. Main concern is having all social housing placed in a “block” possibly stigmatizing ( and identifying) tenants. But there are ways to address that – and I hope Wall examines those.

  • trixie

    Do you mean October 16th?

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Frances, is there a a functioning link on the city’s website to watch council live?

    On Mac, it used to be I could stream council’s live windows media feed on quicktime with flip4mac installed.

    Not sure if windows users are having any better luck.

  • rico

    I like the concept of the 2 floors of industrial plus social housing. And unless we want a permanent ghetto I am not against ‘gentrification’ of the DTES as long as enough social housing is created at the same time.

  • Ned

    When it comes to the DTES developments the City could use GAP Canada expertise. With slogans like this:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2219051/Gap-forced-pull-T-shirt-backlash-Manifest-Destiny-slogan-normalizes-oppression-Native-Americans.html
    GAP would fit right in with the actual administration and their vision for the area…
    Gentrification? Naaah… what gentrification? The city manifest … diversity! Developers happy. Everyone at the Hall happy.

  • jerry

    Once again, the poverty moguls that run the DNC, CCAP and DTES LAPP hijack the council meeting and intimidate the people who live in the immediate area, to the effect that we are too scared to attend for fear of backlash from the angry rabble, whipped into frenzy over class war and “gentrification”.

    What about the need for affordable rental housing? The need to keep the Hastings Corridor from slipping into the same abyss of dysfunctionality and depravity that has plagued the unit and hundred block for almost two decades? What about the needs of the low-income community at RayCam? Why is the Carnegie allowed to overpower their voice?

    The thuggish bullies and political opportunists that wield “gentrification” and class warfare as their weaponry in order to keep the DTES a miserable shithole and their powerbase do a huge disservice to those of us who actually live here

  • Frank Ducote

    There are about 40 members of a woodworking coop – Miller Goodwood – who make this their third home (!) after a fire and a grow op forced them out of two other industrially-zoned premises in the last 10 years or so. There is also an art crate-making business and a professional furniture-making workshop as well. All told over 50 people, artisans and craftspersons, would be forced out, yet again.

    I would hope that both the City and the developer can find a way to provide work space at an afordable rent for these artisans and others groups like them to keep the crafts alive in East Van.

  • Higgins

    Frank #6
    Wishful Thinking Inc.!

  • Frank Ducote

    @Higgins – Hey, I like that company name!

  • Raingurl

    *clapping* Let’s bring the DTES into the next millenium! Leave yer drugs and guns at the door. There’s a new sheriff in town. 😛

  • Lewis N. Villegas

    What are we looking at here? 2.0+ FSR or 5.0+ FSR? The quality of the resulting neighbourhood hangs in the balance.

    For an alternative view of change see:

    http://wp.me/p1yj4U-9Z

    As I stated before, neighbourhood groups must stand on high alert over a CAC-money-grabbing posture that is coming through loud and clear from City Hall.

  • Norman

    Nothing will ever satisfy the DTES groups.

  • Frances Bula

    @Norman. You do get that your two posts together — cheering for the Dunbar opposition, dissing the DTES opposition — appear to be unintentional irony?

  • Norman

    @frances, have you considered the disproportionate amount of attention that is given to the “complaints” from the DTES compared to other areas of the city?