Frances Bula header image 2

Bike-share comes to Vancouver at last, helmets and all

July 20th, 2016 · 18 Comments

So I ambled down to the official announcement of the bike-share launch, held on the picture-perfect seawall with kayakers going by, the glass towers sparkling in the sunshine, and an elderly gentleman playing the street piano nearby.

My official Globe story is here, but those of you who know anything about me realize that I’m a big bike-share user wherever I go. Bike shares are so ideal for so many reasons. As a tourist, I’m long past the age where I can walk 25 miles in no-support rope sandals and not feel any pain. And it takes a long time to see a city by walking. Cars go too fast, are too hard to park. Buses, okay, but they’re limited by routes and schedules. Bikes in a bike share are like travel freedom in a bottle. You see the city close up, at your own pace, and you pick up and drop the bike as needed.

So far, I’ve done New York, Minneapolis, Toronto, Lyon, Paris, Montreal, Montpellier. I would have liked to in San Francisco, but they had none in the Mission district where I was, and in Montevideo, Uruguay, but was too rushed.

So I’ve had a wide range of experiences, mostly good, occasionally bad, i.e. high ratio of malfunctioning bikes, credit cards that don’t work in the system, bike docks impossible to find, etc.

Obviously, my 24-minute ride today from under the Cambie Bridge on the south side to Hornby/Pender downtown isn’t the last word but, here goes

  • SEVEN speeds, compared to the three in other cities. Woohoo. This ought to make the hills a little bit easier.
  • Very smooth. Obviously, these are new bikes, in better shape than a bunch of the clunkers I rode in Lyon, with seats that kept slipping or only one gear. But still, yummy smooth.
  • The helmet is locked to the bike with a cable, an ingenious system. Though CBC did report one cable had already been cut and helmet stolen as of this morning. Still, it’s smart and easy.
  • I was worried when I picked up my bike that I’d end up downtown with no place to dock it. That is actually one of the biggest problems I’ve run into — getting to a place and every spot is filled at docks for blocks around. You see people standing with their bikes waiting for someone to show up and take one out so they can dock. But, for now at least, they’ve got two spots available for every bike there, so no problem when I arrived on Hornby.
  • Not that many bike docks so far (only 23), so hard to judge about how that all is going to work. Based strictly on me, bike systems work best when there are loads of docks, so many that you hardly need a map to find them. At this point, I’m just out of the area where docks are going to be, as I’m sure are many bike riders in this city. But, theoretically, it will expand. The first time I went to New York, there were only about three docks in Williamsburg. Last December, they were everywhere.
  • At the end, took three tries to ensure it was docked properly. I had to jam it in hard three times before I got the signal that it was in.
  • The worst part? Taking it out for the first time. I’ve never had such problems, in part because I’ve always been only a day or week user elsewhere. So you stick in your credit card, get a code and you’re off. Here, as a founding member, I’d been given a fob and was told my four-digit pin. But I guess somewhere along the line a few months ago, someone also emailed me a seven-digit OTHER code. Which I didn’t remember ever getting, didn’t have on my phone, and had to call in for.
  • Then, to actually unlock the bike. It turned out that it use a bike, you have to hit a button on the panel to “wake up the bike.” Then you have to press 1. (Neither of these are intuitive. There were written instructions sent to me but, as a long-time user of bike shares, I paid no attention and assumed I could just figure things out on the spot. So wrong.) Then you put your fob on the marker. Then you enter your four-digit pin. Then you have to do something else on the panel. Then you enter your seven-digit pin. Then you enter your four-digit pin again. Then you put your fob on the marker again. Seriously, folks, I am not making this up. Be prepared. If you are the kind of person who has trouble with your TV remote, you need to bring a teenager with you.
  • Fortunately, I made it through, mostly because I had two highly paid Mobi staffers standing next to me. (I’m pretty sure sweat was running down their backs as I got testier and they started to imagine what would happen if a Prominent Journalist couldn’t go on a bike ride. Media disaster, which would completely negate the carefully orchestrated photo-op ride the mayor made through a special pre-perforated banner in the middle of the news conference.) Anyway, I finally went on my way.
  • A couple of people along the way called out, “Hey, is that the new bike share bike?” and one woman chatted to me at an intersection, all excited about using one.
  • Definitely going to be using when I can, though it will be strange to be doing it in my own city.

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Ken Ohrn

    Boo. You have described the once-only first-time login-registration procedure. Better to describe the rest-of-your-life procedure. Totally simple and fast.

  • Chris Keam

    A woman and I sussed out the first time procedure together while I was looky-looing, so when I came back later to actually use Mobi, it was pretty straightforward. Press ‘2’ on the control panel, enter user code, enter password, away you go. Signed up today, so no fob yet.

    System reset and relocked the bike while I was trying to resize the chin-strap on the helmet, but I just re-entered the codes. Off and riding in under a minute I would guess-timate. I don’t have much experience with other systems (Bixi in Mtl only circa 2008 IIRC) so can’t make an educated comparison to other cities.

    Seconding the public interest aspect. Had two other regular cyclists ask my impression at stoplights and lots of people doing a double take from the sidewalk as I rode past. And a knowing ‘in the club’ nod like those Harley riders and Microbus drivers exchange when I rode past another Mobi-ist at Olympic Village.

    Seat’s a bit squishy soft for my taste (compared to my regular bike) but I wasn’t noticing it by the end of my short ride.

  • Look Deeper

    Some analysis I put together from the publicly available information as of February this year. Perhaps some other readers have better information.

    Source – various media reports and email exchange with the City:

    One time start up fees
    $ 6,000,000

    Operating costs over 5 yrs ($500K per year)
    $ 2,500,000

    Lost parking revenue per yr
    $ 800,000 offset by $400,000 paid to City by CityHop
    Net over 5 years $2,000,000

    Total cost over 5 years
    $10,500,000

    Cost per year ~$ 2,000,000

    1,500 bikes $7,000 per bike (over five years) or $1,400 per bike per year
    5 trips per day*
    200 cycle days per yr**
    = 1,000 trips per bike per year
    Avg cost to COV per trip — $1.40 (assuming a five year life time of a bike)***

    I do not have any information on the CycleHop costs per trip so I have no way of assessing how the $2.50 price to a user will be allocated between CycleHop and COV. This analysis would imply that the COV must get ~56% of all revenues to break even (assuming all users pay the full amount rather than a monthly membership).

    * “A healthy number would be five daily trips per bike, and anything above that is phenomenal, he said” — Josh Squire, the founder and CEO of CycleHop

    ** Average number of rainy days in Vancouver, 165 – Wikipedia
    ** Vancouver’s growing season averages 221 days, from March 29 until November 5 – Wikipedia
    *** Using an assumption of 2 trips per day per bike and 365 days of the year, the average cost to COV is $1.90 or 76% of all revenues.

    _________________________________________

    “To date, no publicly owned and administered bicycle sharing programme has yet been able to consistently operate as a self-funding enterprise, using only revenues generated from membership subscriptions or user fees and charges” – Wikipedia

    In an email exchange with the City, they could not provide any example of a bike share system that is financially sustainable.
    __________________________________________

    Obviously at issue in this decision is that the money spent on this initiative will take resources away from other alternatives, e.g:
    – providing secure bike parking/storage for residents of Vancouver – regular bike commuters (a focus on resident riders rather than tourists);
    – enhancement to the bike street infrastructure;
    – other aspects of Vancouver sports and recreation – community centres, playing fields, playgrounds, etc.
    – other more needed City services.

    (To provide a benchmark from another area, $10.5M is approximately 80% of the net book value of the total collection (books, CDs, DVDs, etc) of the Vancouver Public Library (2014 – $13,137,200, VPL Audit Financial Statement, 2014). The Library collection was used over 9,000,000 times in 2014 and serves over 300,000 active, individual borrowers. Clearly a well-used service.)

    (On the flip side, $10.5M for 5 years of bike sharing looks like a bargain compared to spending $5M to make minor cosmetic changes to the existing Point Grey Road bike route).

    (Or another interesting comparison with resect to the value of public money – the new Gordon Elementary School on West 6th will cost $15M and may potentially save the lives of hundred of children should/when we have an earthquake.)

  • francesbula

    You’re right, it was bad of me not to spell out that was the first time only. I realized it after.

  • Tiktaalik

    Compared against other transportation related costs the city has this seems like a pretty cheap project. Putting things in perspective constructing a single left turn lane on Knight Street for example costs over $3 million dollars.

  • Kenji

    Great analysis. I always believe in making a business case as well as a moral case for spending public money. You’ve certainly laid out the numbers for a projected loss, and that’s useful and interesting.

    I do suspect, with no numbers whatsoever, that a try-before-you-buy effect may occur when/if people give it a shot and realize that city cycling does not require you to be a Lance Armstrong. But I be’s a wishful thinker.

  • neil21

    Nice review, and I’m an excited supporter.

    But the helmet system is not ingenious: they crack on the ground every time you unlock. Never wear a helmet that’s been dropped, never wear a helmet whose history you don’t know. They will be stolen and missing, and that’s ok. The ball is totally in VPD’s court on this one.

    And the temporary lock up cable thing is a bad unnecessary design addition. Bikes should be docked while you’re shopping, and abundant enough so you don’t worry.

    Neal Jennings raised other design points like:
    * No visual feedback when docked like Bixi’s red light. Sure the bike is locked, but does the system ‘know’ it?
    * Near invisible seat post height markings, compared to Bixi’s simple 1 to 10, so you can ‘learn’ your own height.

  • A Taxpayer

    You can’t be a Green City if you do not have a bike share program so we were going to have bike share regardless of what the numbers show. Besides, cost is never a problem when you are spending other peoples money. Or at least it isn’t a problem until the money runs out.

  • Mike

    I agree that the 1st time procedure is overly complex, but… if you show up with your pin, user # and the email with the instructions it’s not *that* bad. Pity to those who don’t have their phone with them, though.

    I had a blast on my first ride (and got a lot of funny looks). My only complaint is that the seat doesn’t go nearly high enough for someone my height.

  • Chris Keam

    My understanding based on appearance is that the helmets are of the type designed to be usable after multiple impacts, in the manner of skateboard/ski helmets.

    Thought the cm markings that correspond to one’s height on the seatpost were pretty clear myself. May have been optimistic on the first try at 1XXcm, but when I accepted the truth of my stature the fit was about right.

    Pretty sure the control panel said ‘good-bye’ or similar when I docked the bike. Nonetheless, a tug on the bike to confirm the dock wasn’t difficult.

    edit: yes to the helmet dropping issue when it unlocks. Happened to me as well.

  • Chris Keam

    They are upset in Miami Beach because their bike share only made $190,000 for the city in 2013. Pointing this out to counter the impression given by the Wikipedia quote, although Decobike isn’t publicly owned or operated (are we considering Mobi to be publicly owned/operated?).

    Additionally, ad revenue (love or hate it) is an important source of income for most bike-shares… so little wonder that the big guys like J.C. Decaux are in the public bike share game right across Europe (plus Brisbane – 2000 bikes). Nearly 25,000 Velib bikes now in Paris according to the Wikipedia entry on Decaux. That’s a lot of rolling billboards (love it or hate it – again) and must make advertisers salivate at the exposure their brand can gain. Not too many people clamoring to have their advertising painted on a parking spot — where it would be obscured a lot of the time.

    In summary, bike share is a land of contrasts. No wait. What I meant to say is that I think that ad revenue is another stream that needs to be projected into the future earnings potential. Thanks for sharing those numbers ‘Look Deeper’. Looking forward to reading them more closely (deeply?), sitting with the information, and gaining a better overall understanding of the economics behind this trend.

    http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/decobike-is-booming-but-taxpayers-are-getting-stiffed-6539813

  • Chris Keam

    Some more relevant numbers – King George Skytrain bike parking station cost $345,000 to build. Couldn’t find a price for the Main St-Science World facility. According to the linked article (published July 16, 2016) both stations cost $2000 to run, but whether that’s per month or a year or what isn’t specified.

    At $1 a day (max $8 a month) it’s (bike parking) arguably even more subsidized than a bike share system. Esp. as uptake appears to be slow at this point, so lots of empty, unused space. Secure bike parking is a great solution for regular trips to the same destination. The best kind is at your place of work, or within a block or two. I would suggest that bike share is a more flexible solution with a larger potential pool of customers and regular bike commuters are better served by having their employer provide an on-site facility of some kind.

    http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2015/07/16/translink-to-open-three-new-bike-parkades

  • Look Deeper

    Chris, I agree completely that all revenue sources need to be included in any financial consideration. I did not have any info on potential advertising revenue. In fact most of my numbers came from digging on the web — the City does not provide such simple information to mere citizens. It would be nice to have a more transparent accounting.

    Equally your information about secure bike parking is also interesting. As a regular bike commuter/user, for me the #1 issue re biking in Vancouver is theft. It is the #1 reason I do not use my bike for many types of trips. Fortunately my employer provides secure parking for my daily commute.

  • A Taxpayer

    Advertising is a key component of Decaux’s Paris program but it isn’t just on the bicycles. As part of the deal, Decaux gets exclusive use of 800 billboards in Paris and anyone who has purchased advertising on a billboard knows it will pay for a lot of bicycles. Clearly a hidden subsidy for the program.

    I would have no problem if the bike share was privately funded and the operator made a ton of money. However using public money to establish a competitor for the commercial bike rental businesses is simply wrong. I know the Mayor has said that tourists are not the target market but that doesn’t mean they won’t be using the service to the detriment of these small business operators. It is really a form of expropriation without compensation.

    It would be interesting to read the business case for selecting CycleHop and how the City expects to avoid the causes of so many failures of other bike share programs. It would appear that CycleHop started implementing systems only over the past year so there is not much of a track record and in cities like Orlando, Phoenix, Tampa and Long Beach which all have climate and topography advantages over Vancouver.

  • Sharon Townsend

    interesting that DeCaux did not want to touch YVR bike share with a 10 foot pole.

  • Look Deeper

    Time will tell how much this ends up costing the City. My guess is a lot more than initial estimates.

    As a regular bike rider, I would much rather use my own bike. Bike share bikes are ok for tourists who have few alternatives but let’s be honest, they are clunky, heavy, and pretty ugly. The only good thing about them is that they are not yours so if they get damaged or stolen, “who cares” and you can leave them pretty much anywhere.

    (I have used the systems in London, Chicago, Washington, and Copenhagen — OK when you have no other choice – Tho we gave up trying to use the Chicago system because the docking stations didn’t “dock”).

    This is a “me too” idea. A game changing idea in my books would be low cost, theft proof bike racks for bikes owned by the citizens of Vancouver. Tourists can support the bike rental shops.

  • spartikus

    What is your source for this claim?

  • A Taxpayer

    You can’t help but compare these numbers (as well as the time it has taken to get bike sharing going) with the experience of car sharing in Vancouver which now consists of 4 private organizations that got themselves established at minimal cost to the city.

    – Over 2,000 cars on the road;
    – Car2go alone has over 100,000 members;
    – A study has shown that for every Car2go vehicle on the road, 9 vehicles were either sold or not bought by members. http://www.metronews.ca/news/vancouver/2016/07/19/car-sharing-reduces-number-of-vehicles-in-vancouver.html

    So not only has car sharing been self-sustaining financially, it has made a significant contribution in reducing the number of cars and GHG emissions. Now how green is that?

    Once again, motorists pay for their own transportation costs and then have to ante up for transit and now bicycle users.