Frances Bula header image 2

Battle of the fundraisers: Vision wins at projecting confidence, money

November 7th, 2011 · 14 Comments

One was at the Bayshore. The other was at the Greek community centre. In the old days, the first fundraiser would have been the Non-Partisan Association’s, the second would have been COPE’s (except it would have been held in a community centre of some eastern European nationality).

But the tables have turned and it was Vision Vancouver, where almost 1,000 gathered at an upscale downtown hotel to donate money for the party, eat some kind of chicken thing, listen to Steve Burgess try to crack some jokes over the sound of 1,000 voices gossiping, wander around and sample desserts from three food carts brought in for the occasion, and more.

The Non-Partisan Association, on the other hand, held the most downscale annual fundraiser that I’ve been to in 15 years of covering city hall. Although the organizers put their hearts into jazzing up the space, the $275-a-ticket event was in a room that felt like a high-school gym, with a mishmash of various dishes (sushi, pasta) on tables at the side, and red, white and blue balloons rising from few tables available. (Most of the 600-some people who attended stood.)

There was a huge difference in the presentations too. Someone said to me that he and a friend were talking and the friend said, “Who do you think wrote Suzanne Anton’s speech?” He answered: “Suzanne.” “And who do you think wrote Gregor’s speech?” “About 10 people, who worked hard to come up with something new that would convey a lot of big ideas.”

Suzanne’s speech was a re-iteration of much she has said before on the campaign trail: A streetcar, a tall building for St. Paul’s, the party that says Yes, not the party that says No like Vision.

Gregor’s speech, on the other hand, tried to reach for some bigger themes. (You can see the speech somewhere on YouTube, or at least the zingers, i.e. talking about people in the city that see “calamity in a new bike lane, apocalypse in a chicken coop, that reads Winnie the Pooh and thinks, ‘Eeyore, that’s a role model for me.'”)

What does it all mean? Well, one could argue that the NPA could have splashed out on a big hotel dinner but is working hard to keep its expenses low.

However, since fundraisers are not just about raising money, but about projecting an image of  momentum and confidence in the party, it looked to many attending as though the NPA just isn’t getting much support.

It is collecting money from its diehard base and from those groups who have wisely learned (ever since Larry Campbell and COPE surprised everyone in 2002 with a near-complete sweep of council) to put some money down on both sides of the election race.

Party organizer Norman Stowe put a good face on this, saying something along the lines of “People who were at Vision Vancouver HAD to be there; people here tonight WANT to be here.”

Of course, this all leads to the burning question of who was buying tickets/tables at each fundraiser: vital information for every unhappy critic who will use the information to decide that one party or the other is in thrall to developers. (Reality check, folks: Until there is campaign-financing reform, developers will always be significant donors to the winning party. They’re the ones with money. It takes money to win. If you turn it down, you guarantee that you won’t be on council.)

So here’s who was where:

Vision Vancouver sent media a full list of their attendees. The NPA did not.

From what I was able to see in the room, NPA attendees included people from:

Concord Pacific, including Terry Hui

ParkLane Developments

Dialog Architects

Great Canadian Gaming

Barwatch

Vancouver Firefighters

And Suzanne Anton made reference in her speech to having had a chance to talk to people in the forestry and mining industry. ??

Vision Vancouver tables were bought by the following:

1 GBL Architects  GBL Architects
4 New Way Concrete Aquilini Group
5 Concord Pacific Developments Inc.  Concord Pacific Developments Inc.
6 Aquilini Group Aquilini Group
7 Rennie
8 Brook Pooni Associates Inc.  Brook Pooni Associates Inc.
9 Polygon
10 Interdependent Investments Joel Solomon
11 BC Cleantech CEO Alliance Cleanworks Alliance Corp./McCarthy Tetrault LLP
12 Artists for Vision sponsored by Wall Capital Wall Corporation
13 West End Supporters
14 Vision YOUTH
15 Vision STAFF
16 Women with Vision donated by Wesgroup
16 Women with Vision – Wesgroup  Wesgroup
17 Gord Wylie Ivanhoe Cambridge
18 Westbank Westbank
19 CUPE 15 CUPE 15
20 Wall Corporation Wall Corporation
21 Tim Stevenson Tim Stevenson Table
22 Corinex Communications Corinex Communications
23 Chrysalix Chrysalix
24 Elemental Energy
25 Out in Schools
26 Rory Richards
27 Friends for Life
28 VanEdge Capital VanEdge Capital
29 Geoff Meggs Geoff Meggs
30 Ryan Beedie Beedie
31 First Nations Friends of Vision
33 Reliance Properties Reliance Properties
34 Parklane West Group
34 Parklane Anthem Property
35 Swissreal
36 Henriques Partners Architects Henriques Partners Architects
37 W2 Media
38 Marcella Munro
39 Women with Vision
40 Elegant Development Inc. Elegant Development Inc.
41 COPE 378 COPE 378
42 Earnscliffe Strategy Group Earnscliffe Strategy Group
43 Bastion Deveopement Bastion Deveopement
44 Solterra
45 Raymond Louie
46 PCI Group PCI Group
47 CUPE 1004 CUPE 1004
48 International Union of Operating Engineers Local 963 International Union of Operating Engineers Local 963
49 Bentall Kennedy Bentall Kennedy
50 Phillipino Friends of Vision
51 Artists for Vision sponsored by Wall Capital Wall Corporation
52 Friends of Ken Clement Friends of Ken Clement
53 Farmers Market
54 viabc
55 Wanson Development Ltd.  Wanson Development Ltd.
56 COPE 378 COPE 378
57 Onni
58 CAW CAW
59 Renewal/Renewal 2 Renewal/Renewal 2
60 Vancouver Taxi Association Vancouver Taxi Association
61 Stratcom Stratcom
62 We Back Man the Juiceman
63 Busters Towing Busters Towing
64 Artists for Vision
65 LGBT Friends of Vision Outlooks TV
66 Donnelly Group Donnelly Group
67 Rising Tide  Rising Tide Consultants Ltd.
68 BARWATCH BARWATCH
69 Lafarge Lafarge
70 Concert Concert
71 Richmond Elevator Richmond Elevator
72 Denise Taschereau Denise Taschereau
73 Nicli Antica Pizzeria Nicli Antica Pizzeria
74 Vision STAFF – Bradley Shend Vision STAFF – Bradley Shend
75 GC Gaming GC Gaming
77 Perkins & Will Perkins & Will
83 Bladerunners
84 Vision Exec
86 Friends of Rob Wynen
87 Friends of Vision General seating
88 Friends of Vision General seating

 

 

 

 

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Peter T

    A good friend went to the NPA dinner and said that it did not feel like a room full of winners.

    He also said that they were frantically calling everyone to see if they could fill the room with FREE tickets?

    It would appear that Gregor will win and the rest of the council, school board and parks board will be a mixed bag.

    I wonder how Peter Ladner would have done if he had run again?

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Reality check, folks: Until there is campaign-financing reform, developers will always be significant donors to the winning party. They’re the ones with money. It takes money to win. If you turn it down, you guarantee that you won’t be on council.

    Is there some kind of fantasy you’re trying to disspell Frances? How does COPE get elected since they don’t accept developer money through the front door?

  • Frances Bula

    @TOAB. They get big whacks of union money or did in the past. The only other way. Both need to be banned. NOT because I think they influence council decisions. COPE would be pro-union even if they never got a dime. And some developers would slide through city hall because they know how to network and give city staff what they want.

    However, I think they need to be banned because the public believes that it leads to biased decisions.

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Big union money, against big developer money. The rest of the public under-represented on council and at the polls. Disappointing and sick.

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    Frances 3, I agree.

  • Glissando Remmy

    The Thought of The Night

    “It will be a battle for the stupid ‘undecided’.”

    A good friend of mine, who BTW, has a kindergarten level in political education, meaning she doesn’t give a sheat on who’s Mayor or who sits on Council… asked me : “Who are … you voting for?”
    I looked at her and said: “As if you don’t know where I stand on Gregor & Comp.” “No, no, no, I know that no one wants to vote for this punks anymore, what I’m asking is, who are you going to really vote for…”

    That is a super educated example of indifference, right there, who will vote anti current establishment. For who? God knows. But for sure, not for Robertson or Vision. Sooo…
    Cut a little with the propaganda, please.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YOh-rpvjYg

    “I like Gregor… he looks you in the eye… and is what Juiceus wants… Seven… oh… Ee… leven… A lot!”

    The Undecided.

    We live in Vancouver and this keeps us busy.

  • gmgw

    Think Outside a Box (that handle’s some kind of irony thing, right?? ‘Cause from here I don’t see much evidence of that practise on your part )#4:

    Why is it that the Cliche-o-matic so often places the word “Big” just before “union”? Not every labour union is the frickin’ Teamsters, you know. In fact, more often than not (at least at the civic level) these donations come from individual locals, which are seldom “big” by any standards. In these days when organized labour is on the run almost everywhere, it’s rather quaint to see how desperately scapegoaters like you still feel the need to cling to the “Big Union” canard. I would respectfully suggest that you update the contents of your bogeyman closet. You’ll feel much better for it.
    gmgw

  • Everyman

    Frances, I’m a little disappointed you didn’t point out that while Vision attended their glitzy, developer-driven fundraiser, they also used it as an excuse to avoid the West End candidates debate.

  • ThinkOutsideABox

    @ gmgw, settle down, no need to be a thug. I wasn’t scapegoating anyone. I’m suggesting that there’s a portion of the public who are under-represented and disengaged in local government.

    The largest backer of Vision Vancouver in 2008 was CUPE. Argumentatively, are you suggesting that CUPE isn’t necessarily “big”?

    Speaking of, I think you misinterpreted what I wrote. By “big” I was referring to the amounts of money, not to the size of the organization making the donation.

  • Paul T.

    I’m actually undecided on campaign finance reform. It was brought in on the federal level and we still attach NDP to unions and Conservatives to big business. I think we’ll always be yelling that one side is unfairly propped up by organizations that aren’t voters.

    I’m more concerned with how MUCH the civic parties can collect and spend. I’d prefer to see spending caps before I’d limit who or what can donate. That would do more to level the playing field and make things more fair.

    Of course the more candidates your running, the bigger the amount you can spend.

    One interesting note Frances. I see Friends For Life is listed as a table purchaser on Vision’s list. I talked with someone from there and you may want to check that fact. He said they did NOT buy a table at all.

  • Frances Bula

    @Everyman. I didn’t point it out because it’s a bogus issue. The NPA had all their people out at a fundraiser the next night. Do you think they would have decamped to go to a community meeting? Doubt it.

    The Vision date was arranged for a long time. Candidates for political parties without exception attend their parties’ fundraisers no matter what else is on.

  • Bill Lee

    Vancouver Courier Werewolf (he calls his twittering “howellings”) posted

    A night at the NPA fundrai$erNovember 4, 2011. 6:26 pm • Section: Civic Affairs

    ….”So who else was there to listen to NPA mayor candidate Suzanne Anton talk about “taking back the city?”

    I’ll start with some more companies and organizations:
    • The Progressive Group
    • Colliers
    • Intracorp
    • Vancouver Hospitality
    • Paragon Development (not the Edgewater Casino owners)
    • The Vancouver firefighters’ union
    • Kenstone Properties
    • Maclure’s Cabs
    • Curve Communications (NPA council candidate George Affleck is the operator)
    • Pumpjack/Junction Pub

    There were more but Stowe wouldn’t provide media with a complete list, saying he didn’t want to give his list to Vision. What I think he meant there is that if Jeff, Frances Bula and I posted it, then Vision would get to see it, too.

    Not sure what the big deal is.”

    from http://blogs.canada.com/2011/11/04/a-night-at-the-npa-fundraier/

  • Frances Bula

    @Thanks, Bill

  • Everyman

    @Frances 11
    I disagree. Maybe in a regular election cycle, bought certainly not in one where the Mayor’s cursing of West End residents has actually given birth to a new political “party”: NSV. It seems the height of arrogance that having made that colossal blunder, Vision would not even offer up one of their lesser lights (hello Tim “the expendable” Stevenson) to represent at an important debate 3 blocks away.