Frances Bula header image 2

Another round of lawsuits from buyers at Olympic village

March 17th, 2011 · 28 Comments

Buyers of pre-sale condos frequently have complaints when they move into the suites that they had only seen on paper when purchasing.

From parking-garage leaks to countertops that stain to units whose views are not what was expected, I’ve heard all many stories over the years. Buyers at the Olympic village, though, are claiming that deficiencies in their units are beyond the norm.

Another hit for the village, whether you think these complaints are serious or not.

On this note, I’d be interested in hearing your stories about your own condos (or those of your friends and acquaintances) and what experiences you’ve had.

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Bill Smolick

    Buy presale, accept the risk, get what you deserve.

    I’m very happy with my place. It was built in 1962.

    Olympic Village complaints smack of class based snobbery.

  • HKHoward

    We bought off plan at the Bosa built Verona at Granville and 7th. We put in $28,000 in extras which were installed exactly as detailed. Bosa had a repairman with a spare parts cart on the premises for the first year and if you had a problem you just called him. I have bought properties on 3 continents and this was the best experience ever

  • Joseph Jones

    Leaky condos, the Vancouver trademark. Along with EcoDensity™!

  • Deacon Blue

    ““I just paid $1.3-million for this unit and it doesn’t have a heating system or a cooling system.”

    Duck and cover. Is that LEED Platinum?

  • Ron

    Apparently, it’s “normal” for the capillary heating and colling to gradually change room temperature. There’s no instant on and off for those systems.

  • dave

    I’d be interested in an explanation a seven year old could understand ,,,, ” why a developer seller can renege on a sales contract if his costs are higher then expected but a buyer cannot renege if values subsequent to the contract decline precipitously”

  • boohoo

    I’ve owned in two different Bosa towers built in the early/mid 2000’s and in a Concord tower built about the same time. All bought presale. No issues (except perhaps an overzealous strata council!).

  • Max

    I have to admit, I’d be miffed too if I purchased my place, in good faith, and was hit with problems from the get go; not to mention that buddy next door is getting the same unit for 30% less than what I paid.

    As the frog says ‘it’s not easy being green’.

    For me, I have been in my place since ’93 with zero complaints. We’ve had to do the regular maintenance, such as re-roofing, painting etc, but we have had no major problems. There is very little turn-over in the residents and we all pitch in to help out with small maintenance items and gardening etc.

    And the one bedrooms are a decent size – 650 sq ft, with very large balconies – 110 sq ft.

  • Bill McCreery

    Why didn’t / doesn’t Millennium / the City / the Receiver / Bob Rennie get in there and fix the problems? A leaking pipe in the ceiling should not be a deal breaker.

    Another glaring example of bad Vision management.

  • Mira

    Why don’t these morons go after Ballem, Robertson, Meggs, Sadhu, McLellan, and the rest of the apparatchik? Vision incompetents are the ones that volunteer to take over the whole project and become the developer, the banker, the marketeer . Not to say that I think they have no chance in hell! You gambled and you lost people! Morons with money. Too much of it. And no brains. D’oh!

  • Joe Just Joe

    This isn’t a political issue why are we trying to make it one? These buyers are trying everything they can to get out of legally binding contracts, you could be sure if prices increased by 50% they wouldn’t have cared. Most of the issues they are having is what the warranty is for and you can be sure the items will be fixed. Complaining about the size of bedrooms, well that is where due diligence comes in. The plans were there when they bought, if they beleive they were altered in size then their is legal recourse built into the system, no need for suits. The truth is they now know they overpayed and they want recourse. A small glimer of light for them is their property tax bill will be smaller then it would’ve been now with their new value. 🙂

  • pacpost

    “These aren’t speculators.” Complete and utter nonsense.

    They signed a contract for a building that wasn’t built yet. That’s speculation. Sure, it’s become the thing to do in Vancouver this past decade, but it’s still speculation.

    “I just paid $1.3-million for this unit and it doesn’t have a heating system or a cooling system.”

    He/she obviously hasn’t tried to understand how the new tech works. Yes, it’s different to what he/she is used to, and it’s quite possible it hasn’t been working properly (why didn’t the developers go with the Passiv Haus standard? Thousands of buildings and apartments have been built to this standard in Germany, Austria and Switzerland), but that statement shows complete ignorance.

    I have no sympathy for these fools.

  • Max

    Part of the problem is that these units were rushed. They were orignially planned as Leeds Gold and in order to be all things great and green, the plans were altered to become Leeds Platinum.

    By changing the standards it also pushed up the costs – labor working 24/7 to get it done, materials etc.

  • Higgins

    Max,
    ‘Part of the problem is that these units were rushed. ‘
    Yes. And those ‘investors’ rushed to pick up the pork with dreams of great return$!
    No empathy there from me. Not to say that most of these speculators, because that’s what they really are, were probably never intending to live there. Flip-flopping ? Absolutely. Now that they lost at Craps, and the dice didn’t fall on 7, they see the cracks in the walls and the dripping faucet maybe the smaller bedroom. LMAO! Anyone could have seen the units layout years in advance if they only attended any of the Urban Design, DPB or even maybe one of the open house meetings. But it’s hard when you bid for the unit over the phone form Kowloon, Tripoli 🙂 or from Dubai city.
    As per Frankie… Strangers in the night exchanging glances, Dubi dubi du……..

  • Morry

    Bedroom too small? Leaky pipes?

    The first is called due diligence! (assuming the size is as were on the plans). No chance of money back.

    The leaks can be fixed. no legal action will succeed for money back.

    Suck it up folks.

  • Morry

    @#fb – New Yorkers Support Bicycle Lanes, Poll Finds http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011.

  • Morry

    By the way Mr Garth Turner is / has been predicating a 20-30% correction in Real Estate. Perhaps the Oly -Vill meltdown is the Canary in the Condo.

    Mr Geller? your views? are we due for big correction in our RE market? What does Bob Rennie think?

  • Diderottoo

    Completely (almost) off topic, has anyone noticed that the City hasn’t produced an annual report since the Gregor Vision council came into office? Never before has the City been more than about a year behind in producing annual reports. The last one appears to be 2007. What’s up here ? too many embarrassing facts?

  • Morry

    annual reports? give your head a shake. Vision twitter their reports ;-0

  • rf

    As i’ve said before, and will say again, the real estate bubble will pop when they finally find something to arrest Bob Rennie for.

  • Joe Just Joe

    I guess they could have the Fashion Police nab him for wearing those sneakers with the sweater vests. 🙂

  • Gassy Jack’s Ghost

    LOL rf.

    I noticed graffiti on the side of the Keefer in Chinatown yesterday (about a block from Rennie’s office/gallery).

    “Dear Bob Rennie… everything is not alright…”

    The penthouse condo in this building (formerly a Benevolent Society building), is currently on the market for $3,999,000.00.

    That’s right, $4million!

    Sigh…

    As I was there, I was also wonderering how many condos they could fit into the massive, and always empty, parking garage across the street? Wouldn’t renovating this huge concrete monolith do wonders to revitalize Chinatown and animate the square? (I mean, yunno, rather than trashing the Historic Area with a bunch of towers around the corner on Main St.).

    Just saying.

  • Michael Geller

    “By the way Mr Garth Turner is / has been predicating a 20-30% correction in Real Estate. Perhaps the Oly -Vill meltdown is the Canary in the Condo.

    Mr Geller? your views? are we due for big correction in our RE market? What does Bob Rennie think?”

    Morry, While I will not speak for Bob Rennie, I will offer a few thoughts on OV and the housing market as a whole.

    I do not think anyone should attempt to generalize about the Vcr real estate market based on what happened at OV. The fact that prices were reduced by 30%in this project is not a reflection of a drop in the market. It is a reflection of the overly aggressive pricing for this development when it first went on sale, and in May 2010 when it was re-launched.

    I think it is fair to say that most developers and real estate analysts in Vancouver always considered this project to be over-priced, given the location (it’s not yet Coal Harbour, or even the North Shore of False Creek); the general site and building designs which reduce the number of units with views and result in many contorted layouts, and the overall standard of finishes. I would also add that given the extent of exterior walls, which are included in the floor space calcualations, the effective interior area is often less than for a comparable unit in a more conventional building form.

    That being said, I do believe that many of the units are now much more fairly priced. Indeed, I did encourage a friend of mine to purchase a penthouse unit at what I thought was a very attractive price.

    As for concerns about construction quality, while there have been problems, including water pouring out of at least one light fixture, and problems with the heating system, I am told by people in the industry that the construction quality is not any worse than what one has come to expect in the Vancouver market. I understand that some of the green features have ‘bugs’ that need to be worked out, but this happens with many innovations. One day, they should offer increased livability and other benefits.

    There is no doubt that some of the finishes are below the standard one might expect for a $1000 a sq.ft. plus product, but they are in line with $700 a sq.ft. product.

    As for the unit layouts, there is no doubt that many of the plans are quite odd, and not always as furnishable as they should be. As to why this is, I too would like to hear from the marketing team, since this is something they usually go over with the developer and architects. (Sadly, too many architects are more concerned with the overall look and appearance of a building, than whether a bedroom is properly dimensioned to accommodate the required furniture.)

    It is my view that the plans were not as good as they should have been because of the very large number of units being built at once; the many different unit types resulting from the many, non-standardized building forms; and the shortage of time due to the rush to get permits issued and construction underway.

    (As an aside, I have spent weeks trying to perfect 3 unit types for a small project I am doing in W.Van, and am still fretting about certain details!)

    But is the OV signaling a potential drop in the Vancouver market? No. Is the Vancouver market going to drop? Well, some of us have thought prices were too high for quite a long time. But now that many buyers are coming here from Mainland China, prices have remained high, especially in certain areas. (Personally, I find the prices being paid for West Side Vancouver and Richmond single family lots outrageous.) And to some degree, this indirectly influences the prices being asked for other properties.

    While Vancouver prices are high by Canadian and North American standards, as evidenced by a recent photo essay on the most expensive streets in the world, they are still less than some European and Asian cities.

    Two final thoughts. In my opinion, the adverse publicity resulting from the lawsuits from disatisfied purchasers has to be having some effect on the current sales program. How can it not? At the same time, I too find it hard to be too sympathetic towards someone who probably devoted less time purchasing a very expensive apartment than they would devote towards the purchase of a new car.

    In this regard, I would urge future purchasers to review the floor layouts and unit outlooks carefully, both in the daytime, and at night.

    Finally, as for Garth Turner….well, he has been predicting significant corrections in the market for a long, long, time. One day, he’ll be right, of course, just like the person who keeps betting on the same number on a roulette table. But in the meanwhile, anyone who followed his advice in the past has probably missed out on some significant property appreciation, especially in Vancouver.

  • Morry

    Mr Geller – I would like to thank-you very much for sharing your views on the OV and the general real estate trends in Vancouver. Very informative.
    Regards

  • Roger Kemble

    MIchael @ #23

    While Vancouver prices are high by Canadian and North American standards, as evidenced by a recent photo essay on the most expensive streets in the world, they are still less than some European and Asian cities.

    Yes Michael your cool, clinical assessment of Vancouver, indeed world, real estate surprises no one. My kids have become millionaires by just keeping up with their property taxes and since they love their old Dad I have no worries.

    Others are not so lucky!

    Time was Japan was our pot-of-gold by virtue of their excellent auto and hi-tech industries: buying up our debt.

    Now it is China’s turn with one important shift: China’s wealth comes from useless plastic knick-knacks that rapidly end up in the dump. With our penchant for piles of Walmart trash I am sure that will go on forever.

    How many wars is Canada now involved in? Veiling the need for more oil to feed our mindless profligate habits, I lose count! How many pipelines will we need to fulfill the insatiable needs of our Sino benefactors?

    I dunno, I wish I could be as cool as you are!

    . . . am still fretting about certain details!. So, fret about the details Michael. Mies said, God is in the details!

    But, aaaaw, what does that have to do with Vancouver’s real estate party?

    Did not John Maynard Keynes say, “ . . . it doesn’t really matter, in the end we are all dead?

    PS I am sorry OV is getting a rough deal . . .

  • MR. BOND

    I don’t understand what the previous buyers were trying to accomplish by releasing the video to the public about the defects in the OV? The matter will be settled in the courts, if it goes that far, and by showing the potential defects in the building, they are only going to hurt the resale value of their own units if/when they try to sell them???

  • Scottie

    I always wondered if I was the idiot that just did not get overpriced real estate. I watched everyone trip over themselves paying way too much for something that hasn’t been built yet, I mean if one were to pay $20,000 for a car or $600 for an ipad would you not test drive it first and see if suited you? Paying $hundreds of thousands to million plus with blind trust is pure and simple stooooopidty, and greed. The most you folks will get is Harold the handy man knocking on your door that’s it.

  • douglas

    @Michael Geller: “As for the unit layouts, there is no doubt that many of the plans are quite odd, and not always as furnishable as they should be.”
    One of the complaints I read in the suit was that there was a conflict with door swings, as the bathroom door swung out into the hallway. The purchasers should be advised that this is now a feature of the Vancouver Building Bylaw under ‘enhanced accessability.’ In order to accomodate properly a visitor or resident in a wheelchair, at least one bathroom within the suite needs to be h’cap accessible. The door can swing in, but in order to accommodate the wheelchair a developer would then have to extend the length of the washroom over two more feet, a sacrifice most developers will not want to entertain (space = money). Thus the door swings out – wacky but compliant.
    IF the owner wants to eliminate the conflict after the fact, that is their business. This ‘wacky’ feature is part of the current Bylaws and is not a ‘design flaw’ particular to OV