Frances Bula header image 2

A new private-investment fund puts money into Canadian subsidized housing projects

November 17th, 2015 · 4 Comments

It’s been a struggle in Canada to create affordable housing since the federal government bailed out of supports for social housing under the Liberals in 1994.

Their withdrawal prompted many provinces to cut back or eliminate their programs.

That’s left cities, with a limited tax base, and non-profits to struggle with this on their own. For cities, the solution has often been to either provide free or discounted land, through a lease, or cover some of the costs through giving extra density to a site or both.

And even under those circumstances, it’s taken some creative thinking. The latest in that creativity is a new investment fund that’s been developed under the leadership of a former Scotia banker, who seems to have devoted considerable thought to how to get private investors to see putting their money into subsidized housing as a good deal.

The trick is to underscore the competitive returns the investment will get, compared to the private market. As Garth Davis explains, that’s possible because subsidized-housing projects get free or discounted leased land and they traditionally have the lowest (i.e. non-existent) vacancy rates, since there is a line-up for those units.

As I wrote in my Globe story last week, this creation, New Market Funds, is putting $11-million into Vancouver’s experiment in creating subsidized housing with no federal and limited provincial help.

There was quite a bit of discussion on Twitter about the risks and the structure of this kind of lending — and a lot of interest.

Funds like this aren’t new. There are many in the U.S. However, those are usually dependent on investors getting a return through the American tax incentives for low-cost housing. So this Canadian fund, which has to rely on other mechanisms, is really breaking new ground.

 

 

 

Categories: Uncategorized

  • jolson

    excellent!

  • peakie

    As one person put it, “they are “Kickstarting” housing bonds”
    But how is ‘interest’ part guaranteed?

  • Everyman

    Methinks Ng Weng Hong has too much skin in the game. It’s a shame they didn’t pay more attention to Ian Young and Andy Yan’s articles and research rather than fall back to tribal defense mechanisms. Too try and compare Vancouver Real estate to that in some corrupt third world African country is ridiculous. All Hong’s prevaricating does is ensure the backlash will grow and makes things worse for ordinary immigrants trying to settle here.

  • MB

    Sounds very promising. I wonder, though, how a rise in interest rates will affect the estimated 6% return to investors even without the land component, and how much of that will result in rent increases? Not so long ago 6% or 7% interest rates were normal.

    Another limitation may be how much land the city is willing to devote to a single use for essentially forever. The demand could be extraordinarily high given today’s purchase prices and slow average earnings growth, especially when subsidies and affordable base rental rates are offered.