Frances Bula header image 2

A meditation on Vancouver’s lovely modern buildings here

April 27th, 2010 · 13 Comments

Every time I drive around the region, I’m jolted again by some new architectural trend even more hideous than the last one in this city that is allegedly the envy of the world.

Each new version of the archetypal Vancouver special is so spectacularly more ghastly than the last one — decorative glass doors! wedding-cake tops! startling new colours! fake white bricks stuck on the front! — that it makes me long for the days of the original specials, with their simple, clean lines and restrained colour combinations of white and stucco.

Then there are the fake Tudor rowhouses, the suburban monster houses in all their varieties, the boring all-glass point-tower condos that litter the city. The past two years have brought some a new decorative touches that just make you puzzled: strange splashes of colour in the condo forest, as others try to emulate James Cheng’s lego-like touches on his Spectrum towers, for one. The saddest of all — those who’ve taken to trying to upscale their modest World War Two stucco bungalows by putting Whistler-style rock facades on them. A little Home Depot is a dangerous thing.

So it was nice to get a small book in the mail the other day that is a reminder of some of the beautiful buildings that have been built here the last 20 years. I flip through the pages and remembers it’s not all a horror show out there, as I see pictures of Bing Thom’s wavy-roofed Sunset Community Centre, the glass and concrete Salt Tasting Room in Gastown’s Blood Alley, the First Nations House of Learning at UBC, the simple and elegant Celebration Hall at Mountainview Cemetery, among many others.

A Guidebook to Contemporary Architecture in Vancouver is a companion to similar books in Toronto and Montreal. (See reviews/links here and here.) The Vancouver version, overseen by UBC architecture prof Chris MacDonald, is filled with micro-essays by local architecture critics Adele Weder and Matthew Soules, two local writers who have been bringing playfulness, lovely descriptions and rigorous criticism to their observations about Vancouver for a while.

Some sentences might be challenging for those not familiar with architect speak (“inside, the surprising intensity of the space and its ingenious roof structure is thoughtfully withdrawn from the informal adjacent uses”) but many are not. And it’s delightful to tour around town, via this book, and look more closely (with thoughtful commentary) at the many buildings and structures that do provide us with visual pleasure.

It is specifically focused on 1990-2010, a period that is bracketed by Expo and the Olympics, so you won’t see references to Arthur Erickson’s Robson Square or SFU here, although there is lots of Erickson elsewhere and a Peter Busby-designed arts complex at SFU is included.

I appreciated seeing a wider range of architects and of buildings represented than was in Trevor Boddy’s recent Vancouverism show. This book does includes lots of Erickson, Thom, Cheng and Fast + Epp work, with lots of usual-suspect buildings: the Shangri-La, the Richmond Olympic Oval, Woodward’s, the Olympic village. But it’s got lots of little surprises, some that I hadn’t heard of: Acton Ostry’s Har-El Synagogue in the British Properties, Pechet and Robb’s Pier in North Vancouver, Woods Columbaria in West Van, and their GRANtable in downtown Vancouver (a 66-foot-long table in a Beach Avenue park), and the Millennial Time Machine at UBC, another Fast + Epp creation designed by superkul architecture.

I also appreciated the inclusion of modest buildings (and in my neighbourhood!) like Acton Ostry’s The Stella, the new condo complex at the corner of Kingsway and 12th that houses a car dealership on the ground floor, which lights up at night with the richly coloured panes of glass at the hall ends on each floor, and the so-restful modernist Sun1 townhouses that sprang up at Prince Edward and 15th amid the three-storey walk-ups all around. (And I see from the book that the architects were BattersbyHowat, which I didn’t know until this moment.)

And, when you want to ponder what it all means in the grand scheme of things, you can read Adele’s and Matthew’s essays that open and close the book. To end, as Matthew does:

“So ask yourself as you explore Vancouver and its architecture: In what ways has the city succeeded in building a benevolent utopia and in what ways has it built its inverse: an attractive and comfortable but ultimately disatisfying dystopia? Whatever the answer, it is clear that Vancouver’s architecture and urbanism is unique. As a relatively young city that at the outset of the 21st century is still inventing itself, it is exciting to witness so clearly in Vancouver the defining hopes, preoccupations, and struggles to realize the best possible city of the future.”

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Urbanismo

    http://members.shaw.ca/urbanismo/two.little.places.pdf

  • MB

    I can’t think of any architect who designed tacky Vancouver Specials at any time in the past 30 years, but I can think of two who bought them for themselves and stripped them of pretension and added their own unique interpretations of how to transfigure light, space and program.

    You’d have to put the blame where it’s most deserved, on small time builders whose most prevalent talent is knowing how to build to the most minimal legal standards while maximizing lot coverage and floor space as cheaply as possible.

    I fear one day they will learn how to strip it down even more to oriented strandboard boxes with a “one-coat-is-all-you-need” roof membrane, a peel n’ stick facade (1001 choices) from Craftsman to Tex Mex), and asphalted yards (front, back and sides).

  • Bill Lee

    But people live inside a house, not on the outside. They see that for about 30 seconds from parking the car to getting in the front or back door. And it doesn’t register anymore.

    I see there is no ‘review’ at the link above to the Montreal quide. I’m sure Madame Bula will find a French link sometime.

    CA did review the Montreal book 2 years ago with a dash by Leslie Jen among three reviews at : http://www.canadianarchitect.com/issues/story.aspx?aid=1000222968 [The Vancouver book reviewed in CA on 01 March 2010] Presses de l’UdeMontreal published the book translation, also in 2008.
    The Toronto review link is a quick glance and a reminder of the Liebeskind’s Lee-Chin Crystal addition to the ROM being called ‘worst in the world’

    I haven’t seen the book in Duthies yet, but other than the spotlight on places, would hate to read any Weder purple prose. I remember last month her gushing about the CBC/S-RC building refit on Georgia, which many staff hate vehemently, as a remake of the Toronto “Hub” that might cause more labour trouble at Ceeb.

    And then soon we will have Mac Kalman’s son and his exploitation of architecture students for his self-aggrandizing pocket guides. I note in the press that he is trying to get sponsorship. Could this be because no one can make a dime with an art or architecture guide in this village?

    Douglas and McIntyre did make some money (with Bronfman money [Phyllis Lambert] from the CCA) with this (3 books, so far) series
    http://www.dmpibooks.com/book/a-guidebook-to-contemporary-architecture-in-vancouver

  • Bill Lee

    [Yes, I know that Duthies is gone. A little joke.]

    But now Sophia Books, Hastings at Richards, is closing at the end of May, there is a pity. Art, fashion, European (German, Spanish as well as the emphasis on French language) and the inheritance of the Japanese bookstore made a wonderful artistic spark in Vancouver

    Audio interview with Marc Fournier
    27 avril 2010
    Sophia’s Books, la seule librairie franco de Vancouver ferme
    Avec: Marc Fournier, propriétaire, Vancouver.

    http://www.radio-canada.ca/audio-video/pop.shtml#urlMedia%3D/Medianet/2010/CBUF/4C4F447F_20100427_082632.asx&promo%3DZAPmedia_Telejournal&duree%3Dcourt
    8 minutes audio

    Nothing on their website yet. A panoramic video frame to show you want you are going to miss. http://sophiabooks.com/

  • Urbanismo

    Please understand, when you look at photographs you are not looking at architecture. Architecture is to be experienced.

    The Vancouver Special is folk architecture at its best.

    The house, uniquely evolved to fit the 33′ Vancouver lot.

    Over many years it adapted to off-the-shelf building materials . . . builders were able to cost and site-organise to precision: they made money!

    Building departments facilitated a familiar icon acceptable to the neighbourhood.

    The Vancouver special is an east Vancouver family home and a mortgage helper.

    You wont find one anywhere else in the world . . .

  • Lewis N. Villegas

    The architectural vanguard in the period under discussion turned to urbanism. Messy, difficult, and full of set backs, but the cutting edge where design can make the greatest difference and effect the most public good.

  • MB

    @ Urbbie: “The Vancouver Special is folk architecture at its best.”

    In my neighbourhood up to five years ago century-old Edwardian houses with all the trimmin’s — not to mention the guts — made from old growth Douglas fir were binned for plastic ‘folk architecture’ houses.

    That to me is architectural de-evolution.

  • Urbanismo

    @ MB Yeah I know.

    The Vancouver special is as Vancouver as you are. It has been in Van as long as I have, probably longer: conceived and built by unsophisticated carpenter/builder/contractors who knew what time of day it was.

    There is no excuse for “century-old . . . binned . . . Edwardian houses . . . ”

    All that is telling us is that building has degenerated into “development”.

    Where once there was a proliferation of people we could admire and work with . . . well . . . you know the rest . . . .

  • Bill Lee

    All this reminds me of the recent disinterring of Robin Boyd’s “The Australian Ugliness”
    “Book titles do not come much more provocative than The Australian Ugliness, the caustic polemic penned by the architect Robin Boyd which was published in 1960. Boyd took aim at the unsightliness of post-war Australian suburban design, and what he described as its vulgar featurism: the gauche decorations, brick veneers and fussy stylistic embellishments that disfigured cul-de-sacs across the land….”
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/nickbryant/2010/04/the_australian_ugliness.html#comments
    on the 50th anniversary of its publication.

    See also the Wiki entry on Robin Boyd 1919-1971. Book wiki entry is rather short.
    The re-issue Published: 29 March 2010
    Format: Paperback , 304 pages
    AUD$34.95 ISBN-13: 9781921656224

    And a 4 page diatribe by Stephen Lacey in the SMH and Sydney tastes http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/the-triumph-of-ugliness/2008/03/21/1205602658636.html

  • Jon Petrie

    Nomination for best Vancouver building of 2010:

    JJ Bean cafe in CBC plaza:
    http://www.cbrproducts.com/files/u1/jjbean-cafe1.jpg

    And if you are visiting do go round back of the building — laminated vertical raw 2×6’s with small splashes of red covered by a glass wall.

  • Frances Bula

    Yes, I’ve noticed that little coffee bar too and love it

  • MB

    Delightful! Perhaps we could have some of these on the street and at major bus stops.

  • Ron

    I don’t see people trumpeting the architectural virtues of the Vancouver Special – but I certainly don’t people trumpeting either the architectural virtues or the functional aspects of the post-war bungalow that many of the Specials replaced.