Frances Bula header image 2

A good-news post: Small pockets where people are creating community in Vancouver

July 3rd, 2012 · 35 Comments

There has been a lot of news lately about the sense of loneliness and isolation that many people experience in Vancouver, as a result of Vancouver Foundation research into that subject.

Even though I was one of those interviewed by the foundation and even though I listed that as my number one concern, I was surprised to find out it was shared by so many others. I thought my sense of disconnection was mostly my fault — my life was too busy for hanging around and connecting with neighbours; I had always chosen very heterogenous neighbourhoods to live in, where it was sometimes hard to connect because of language barriers; etc.

But it turns out it was not just me.

There is a lot of thinking to do about how to overcome some of the barriers that Vancouver has to connecting, but, since I was interviewed, I have been privileged to witness little explosions of community in my vicinity.

Quite independently of each other, several little groups of people have done things to help foster conversations and a sense of neighbourliness in the blocks near my house.

One group of young people constructed a small set of shelves with an overhang to create a little free-store library, where people drop off or pick up books. It has become one of the pleasurable aspects of the neighbourhood. Almost every time we walk by, there are people pondering the books, often murmuring to each other about interesting finds. (The idea has been such a hit that Global TV did a little segment on it last week and people as random as a contractor visiting my house wanted to offer to build similar small libraries for anyone who wanted them around the city, for groups that provided the materials.)

Another household a block away has put out a coffee machine on its boulevard, offering free coffee to the thousands of cyclists that pass by on the bike route.

Still another group has turned the roundabout into a tea-party site (of the old-fashioned kind, not the anti-tax, anti-Obama kind) where there is often a small cluster of people sitting at a small table talking over cups of whatever. The group has also replanted the circle. Up the street, another family has taken over and is maintaining another circle a block away.

They are such small projects but have generated huge interest and a sense of warmth in the neighbourhood. It makes me wonder what else is going on in other neighbourhoods — I am sure more than we realize — and what could happen.

I would love to hear other ideas about small ways to create community in Vancouver.

Two of my own: Bring back dumpsters to the city Keep Vancouver Spectacular days. I know that in my neighbourhood, that was an extremely popular event that managed to transcend the language barriers and brought everyone together to clean junk out of the alleys, as well as share cakes donated by the local bakery.

Another: Communal dinners. I wrote a magazine article in Western Living last year about the communal dinners that many Seattle restaurants offer, where once a month or so, the restaurant offers a set menu and family-style seating with groups of six to 12 people seated together. I have been to several and it has been a great way to meet people — in Seattle. Now if I could only find the same in Vancouver.

Categories: Uncategorized

  • Michael Kluckner

    A group of us get together as the Grandview Heritage Group, http://grandviewheritagegroup.org/, very informally, to trade stories about the neighbourhood’s history and people. We applied for and received a tiny ($350) grant from the Vancouver Foundation, which we will supplement with money from a couple of walking tours, to put up some “century house” signs that will say, “This building is 100 years old this year.” They’ll be moved around the neighbourhood as the seasons go by. And we heard that a group on Lakewood are having a block party for their century-old houses at the end of July. It’s just a little thing, but we’re getting new people coming out to each gathering and getting to know neighbours better.

  • Ron Peters

    These are great ideas! I don’t know if Vancouver is particularly bad or not, but it can’t possibly hurt, wherever we are, to be thinking about how we can build up our sense of community.

  • Tom

    The Irish Heather Long Table Series is similar to what you describe in Seattle.

  • jesse

    “I have been to several and it has been a great way to meet people”

    Dim Sum at busy restaurants begets small groups sitting together. The protocol, alas, is limited interaction other than sharing hot water pots to refill tea.

    What wonderful stories; one wonders how practicable such would be in dense condo-laden neighbourhoods.

  • Bill Lee

    Seems a random set of people.
    15%?
    Or is the goal 100% interaction with 100% of the residents in a certain area.

    Much of the interaction in the city comes from the (fewer) children attending school in a local area. Elementary schools are meant to be within walking distance. (High schools are too, but some are 2 or 3 km from the closest high school.
    So it all comes down to really, really affordable housing and putting children out for 8 years (overlapping siblings at elementary school).
    See Tuesday’s Grope and Flail on the middle class angst and empty Chanel purse by ex-Vancouverite and Vancouver Province reporter Tamara Baluja
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/parenting/todays-modern-parent-daycare-poor-with-little-to-save/article4385208/

  • Gladys

    I just went to a lovely Canada Day potluck at a friend’s townhouse in Burnaby. It seems that they have random gatherings all summer long on one of the complex’s lawns. There’s a small group chatting, then someone brings out the appetizers, and pretty soon, there’s a block party going on. Not sure how to replicate that, but it’s a nice model.

  • brilliant

    @jesse 2-Spot on. When I lived in condos are apartments there was never that kind of community involvement. Only when I bought a house did I really feel part of a neighbourhood, that had block parties, neighbourhood watch etc. Of course Vision Vancouver has set out to destroy those very neighbourhoods.

  • Chris Porter

    I almost don’t want to mention it because of many people love to hate the Olympic Village, but there’s a strong community forming here. Spurred on by the community gardens, dog park, new community businesses, and an active Facebook group, the neighbourhood has really come alive in the past few months. A few weeks ago I was at a community potluck with a mix of people from all of the buildings (condos, the co-op, and apartments). This weekend some neighbours are organizing a pick-up baseball game.

    It’s unlike anything I’ve ever experienced in Vancouver, and I’m glad to hear it’s happening in other neighbourhoods.

    http://canadianveggie.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/village-life/

  • Lisa C

    The traffic circle thingie has a name, actually: it’s called ‘Gather Round’. There’s even a website http://gatherround.ca/ with info on it & how to get involved in other projects to create community in Vancouver. Really worth taking a look!

    Have you seen the new street mural on St. George just north of Broadway? It’s part of the St. George Blueway project which is aiming to daylight the creek that now runs in culverts under the street. Here’s the facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/St-George-Blueway/200723006720755

    Also, there’s the Brewery Creek Community Garden that just got built in Guelph park–have you seen that? 🙂

  • IdleWild

    @ brilliant
    In what way has Vision “set out to destroy those very neighbourhoods”? What policies have they established or decision have they made that are negatively impacting simgle family neighbouthoods? The city continues to be zoned primarily for single family homes and duplexes. There is ongoing support for community celebrations such as Italian Day, Greek Day, Car Free Day, farmers markets and other events.
    What neighbourhoods are being destroyed and how?

  • Dan Cooper

    Everyone’s experience and needs differ of course, and perhaps I’m just an antisocial curmudgeon that does not recognize what he’s missing, but as a relative newcomer (under a decade) in Vancouver I have already long since stopped feeling any social isolation and do not feel the need for someone to build some special place to meet the neighbours; in fact, there already seem to be a lot of such places and other pportunities around! e.g. I’m on my strata council so I know and do things with lots of people in my building; both my child and I take classes at the community centre so we know the instructors and staff and other regular participants there who come back year after year; then there are people from his sports…people from his school (yes, the local one)…people from my work…people who have been sitting in the same section with us for years at the sporting events we attend…people from a local board I sit on…

  • Maude

    I like this kind of stuff and hope for more of it…

    Unfortunately many of these “creating community” events potentially violate several CoV by-laws and other regulations.

    It is only a matter of time before an anti-social neighbour reports such unsanctioned activity and inspectors come for a visit…

  • Ilove604

    Great article Frances!

    I’m starting a Neighbourhood Committee in my Gastown building and these stories have given plenty of fodder.

    Check out Socialfeed.com for communal dining events in and around Vancouver.

  • Patsy

    The Citygate neighbourhood is amazing ! I have lived in Vancouver all of my life and here for 10 years and this is a wonderfully friendly and civic minded community of 13 buildings including 2 BC Housing buildings and a co-op. Via the Inter-tower Community Group we are all connected through a central organizing group that includes Blockwatch, Keep Vancouver Spectacular ( 8 yrs involvement), and ongoing civic interaction. This is a very connected and impressive community that sees this neighbourhood as their home. We are very lucky to have found a vertical neighbourhood and a community in a large scale condo development. Thank you, all of you, for making our neighbourhood GREAT !

  • Max

    Last night on the news, there was a cute story of a community piano in Campbell River.

    It was bought from a thrift shop for $75, painted up, and it moves around the town allowing people to sit a play for as long as they like.

    At night, the shop keepers take it in so it doesn’t get vandalized.

    They are now looking at adding a second.

    It was a nifty little idea.

  • Frances Bula

    @Lisa. I didn’t know about the website, which is odd, as I get notes through my mailbox from the “gather round” people. Live and learn. And I must have seen the mural, as I pass by the all the time, but I can’t specifically recall it, so live and learn some more. But did know about the new Brewery Creek garden! So thanks for all.

  • brilliant

    @IdleWild-If you look at the so-called affordable housing report you see it calls for transition zones between arterials and single family homes. This is code for allowing multi-unit, multi-level housing into SFH neighbourhoods.

  • MB

    @ brilliant 17

    This is code for allowing multi-unit, multi-level housing into SFH neighbourhoods.

    Oh the humanity …

    Have you considered that the “transitional areas” would perhaps a block long at best?

    With 70% of the private land in Vancouver devoted to that icon of efficient land use planning, the SFH on large lots, the transitional areas may be a few single-digit percentage points of the several tens of square km of SF detached zoning.

    And just what is so precious about street after naked street of poorly built, cheap SF Specials, or for that matter pumped up expensive Specials on larger lots?

    I suggest that a relative minority of Vancouver’s housing stock still consists of character / heritage houses, and that the transitional areas is totally justified.

    What I don’t buy is that this some kind of consiratorial policy.

  • MB

    I’ve always liked those long community tables you see in some parks. Perfect for neighbourhood outdoor gatherings.

  • spartikus

    What I don’t buy is that this some kind of consiratorial policy.

    Come now, MB. Surely you know by now it’s always a conspiracy.

  • brilliant

    @MB-As you should know Vision has targetted the city’s so called “inner suburbs” for higher density which includes most of the city’s heritage homes. In fact by my reckoning your own home would fall smack into the sweet transition spot you describe. So we’ll end up with more of the farce like the City Hall neighbourhood where genuine heritage homes are replaced with ersatz heritage homes designed to fit in with the heritage homes they are replacing. Only in Vancouver!

  • waltyss

    @brilliant:
    How is it that Vision has targettin the city’s so called “inner suburbs” for higher density” and that somehow this is an attack on heritage homes.
    Both civic parties are in favour of higher density. It is after all the NPA mayor Sam Sullivan who coined ‘Eco density” and I recall, tried to copyright the name.
    If you are going to have towers, then having a transition area to single family makes sense.
    My question is what is your point? Are you opposed to densification and want most of the city to remain as single family as it now is. If so, what do you propose we do with the vast majority who cannot afford to purchase a single family residence?
    Ie. do you have an alternative other than a nimbyesque “I’m all right, Jack” If you have an alternative, I would love to hear it.

  • brilliant

    Ah Waltie, Waltie why did I know you’d turn up here after CC folded its tent (unless of course you were here already?)

    It’s common knowledge the city has targetted the inner suburbs (Mt Pleasant, Kits and Riley Park for more density. Like you most of the Vision Council is probably barely aware of the hinterlands of Killarney or Fraserview. Fortunately Vision has a ready supply of bitter and envious basement suite dwellers (either rented or courtesy of mummy and daddy, to support them in their crusade to enrich developers against the evil SFH. Can’t afford Vancouver? Then move to New West or Surrey. Not every Londoner lives in Knightsbridge but you don’t see thdm proposing a forest of McChengs to fix the “problem”.

  • Vanomad

    Just curious @Brilliant what do you mean by McChengs? I don’t follow…

  • waltyss

    @brilliant not
    I’m still waiting for a constructive alternative. We know y0u are capable of the graceless insult. You are well known for them. Now, how about something constructive? You can do it. I have confidence in you.
    Oh wait, wait, suddenly the light went on. You are a nimbyite with a back yard. It seems that you have acquired a sfh and now your view is to damn those that might threaten them. Like anyone who proposes greater density in our city. What are you going to do? All three civic parties support greater density. Maybe you should start a fourth: the nimby.
    I’m with Vanomad. “McCheng”?

  • Everyman

    @vanomad, waltyss
    I believe McCheng is a disparaging term used to describe the glass condo skyline created by James Cheng and imitators along the northside of False Creek.
    Example: http://www.vancouverism.ca/exhibition/james_cheng/work.php

  • Everyman

    I forgot to add today’s Sun had a piece on creating community in condos, with input from our own Frank Ducote:
    http://www.vancouversun.com/What+makes+building+friendly/6903768/story.html

  • waltyss

    @everyman 26. Thank you for the clarification.
    Well, now I understand brilliant nots contribution. Leave the city’s density as it is and if someone can’t afford to live here, then they should move to New West or Surrey. I don’t know how constructive an alternative it is (actually I do) but it is a point of view.

  • L Leeman

    As a life long Vancouverite, I have to say to waltyss that I would rather see people move out to Surrey or New West if they can then afford their house, rather than jam pack more and more people into the same size space of our city neighbourhoods. As you correctly point out, the NPA was all about ‘eco’ density and it was as wrong headed then as it is now. The plan for the city at present, like all the rest in Metro Vancouver, is a plan for infinite growth.
    There is no endpoint identified, no point at which the plan says ‘enough is enough’.. we are full here… head out to New West . As long as there is no such end point formally designed into our planning process, we are doomed to destroy the neighbourhoods that make the city desireable. And it should be recognized, formallly, that we are committed to infinite growth.

  • Jay

    L Leeman- Why should people who work in Vancouver have to live in Surrey and then be punished by having to pay a bridge toll, or a higher transit fare? These are the people who can least afford it.

    What you are advocating is class segregation – I can’t discern the difference from racial segregation. If you can, explain it to me.

  • waltyss

    I. Leeman:
    I live in a neighbourhood where house prices are $2million+. My children will never be able to live there, even when their parents die. This is in part because so much of the city, but particularly the west side, does not efficiently use land. Some of that is changing with laneway housing and multi family housing at least along arterial roads but very slowly.
    I can think of no other major city anywhere in the world which continues to devote so much of its land space to sfh, particularly in the core. That we do it in a city with so little available land is unforgiveable.
    I think the attitude you (and my good friend brilliant not) display is shockingly selfish and the worse form of nimbyism. Thankfully the two of you are in the minority and take positions not supported by any of the civic parties.

  • MB

    @ Sparti 20

    Come now, MB. Surely you know by now it’s always a conspiracy.

    I’ve just realized what the next conspiracy is: To covert those supremely utilitarian cast iron manhole covers into objets d’ art.

    http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/oca/publicart/artunderfoot/

    Brilliant will be apoplectic that this commie wedge policy wasn’t brought to a referendum along with Andrea’s balcony butterfly garden.

  • Andrew Browne

    @ L Leeman #29

    “I would rather see people move out to Surrey or New West if they can then afford their house, rather than jam pack more and more people into the same size space of our city neighbourhoods”

    OK… but apart from downtown and a few VERY specific area in the rest of the City, Vancouver has probably experienced LESS change than most other communities in Metro Vancouver. Vancouver is full?! Are you kidding me? What’s the number, something like 70% or more of the land base is dedicated to large lot single family housing? That sounds like a higher proportion than Coquitlam! Vancouver’s sfh neighbourhoods feel way more “burby” than most of the surrounding region.

    And I’m weirded out that you’d rather see them move? I’d rather them have housing options and choice, rather than be condemned to 2 hrs a day commuting by car.

    “The plan for the city at present, like all the rest in Metro Vancouver, is a plan for infinite growth.
    There is no endpoint identified, no point at which the plan says ‘enough is enough’.. we are full here… head out to New West .”

    First off, you’ve obviously never actually read any regional plans or OCPs. Just because the document doesn’t say “MAX POP=X” doesn’t mean it calls for infinite growth!

    Where does this idea come from that one day the City is ‘done’? It’s a living breathing entity and its never complete. And as for infinite growth, again, are you kidding me? Do you know how hard it is to build even a 40 unit apartment in Vancouver? Who made you the guy that gets to tell people to live in New West or Surrey? People should be able to live where they want and where it is convenient for them to be near work, family, and their interests.

    We need legitimate housing options in Vancouver because all we have at present are 4500-6000 sq ft monster homes and small condominium apartments — with precious little in between.

    The REASON we keep hearing complaints about neighbourhoods being impacted by growth, I think, is precisely because we make the process so painful that by the time the rare gladiator developer is successful they have to build higher density to cover risk and losses on projects that never got off the ground. When “wins” become ever more precious we’re going to see bigger and bigger projects. If everyone would just stop lighting their hair on fire we could achieve some reasonable outcomes and more variety in housing stock.

    /rant

  • StarWestBureau

    Frances,
    Wasn’t there a communal lunch in Gastown earlier this month?
    Saw the posters for it. July 5th? Anyone go?

    SWB

  • Bill Lee

    How it is done in New West
    http://www.tenthtothefraser.ca/2012/07/15/how-to-make-friends-in-new-westminster/

    ….”We are lucky in New Westminster. The community here is very good at creating the conditions that help friendships form and grow.
    There is a science of friendship dating back to the ’50s and holding up through the new millennium. The elements of friendship are these:
    Proximity
    Repeated, unplanned interactions
    A setting that encourages people to let their guard down and confide in each other”….